Now Who Isn’t
Afraid To Go After President’s Killers?
By William E. Kelly, Jr.
The federal prosecutor who quit the racketeering case
against the Aryan Brotherhood in Texas
According to news reports from Texas
The Ayran Brotherhood Texas (ABT )
unlike most criminals, don’t abide by the rules laid down by the organized
crime syndicate’s Commission that made killing cops against the rules – the
rules maintained among the criminal underground, mainly because killing a cop
brings down more and unnecessary heat on all criminals and increases the
determination of some law enforcement authorities to jail them all. 2).
Such political assassinations does achieve the goal all
terrorists aspire of intimidating those legally responsible for upholding the
law, instilling a fear of retaliation – ala the Gregory Peck film “Cape Fear,”
in which a convict released from prison gets revenge against the family of the
lawyer who put him behind bars.
In this case the federal district attorney placed his
own personal safety and security above that of the Constitution he had sworn
to uphold, which is understandable to some, and according to the Constitution,
he is duly replaced by someone who is not deterred by threats to his personal
safety or job security, or accepts those threats as part of the job.
For the same reasons, in the wake of the assassination of
President Kennedy, those in a position of authority chose not to challenge the
Warren Commission’s report’s false conclusion that the president was the victim
of a deranged lone assassin, and follow the evidence that indicates the accused
assassin was set up as a patsy and the President was murdered by a conspiracy
of his enemies.
Why is the government so reluctant to do what it does in
almost every other case of a suspicious death and conduct a grand jury inquriy?
Why?
Their motives may be the same as the DA in Texas United
States
But we do know how they did it. They’ve managed to keep the
case of the murdered president out of court by keeping the evidence and
witnesses from a grand jury and by keeping the pubic debate going vigorously,
for as long as the debate over the single-bullet theory, the Zapruder film’s
authenticity and other such details continue, the Constitutional directive is
conveniently ignored, the real killers go unpursued and there is no justice.
As E. Martin Schotz so eloquently puts it, “All
of this brings us to the real cover-up over all these years, which was not
‘Oswald’ per se but rather ‘the debate over Oswald.’ In this
process we see…the principles of intelligence agency assassination and cover-up
as outlined by Isaac Don Levine, an associate of Allen Dulles, in his
analysis of the assassination of Leon Trotsky by the Soviet
Union ’s NKVD. As Levine revealed, the classic manner by which an
intelligence agency attempts to cover itself is by the use of confusion and
mystery. The public is allowed to think anything it wants, but is not allowed
to know, because the case is shrouded in supposed uncertainty and confusion.
This was and is the big lie, that virtually no one is sure who really killed
President Kennedy or why.”
“Of course over the years” Schotz continues, “the terms of
the ‘debate’ have been shifted as the public has learned more and more about
the case. Thus initially the phony debate was organized around the question of
whether the Warren Report was accurate or not. In other words, the
public was supposed to debate whether there was or wasn’t a conspiracy. As this
position was gradually eroded and it became evident that more and more of the
public did not believe in the lone assassin theory, another aspect of the
debate was developed. The first fallback position of the government was to
acknowledge that perhaps or more than likely there was a
conspiracy, but if there was, the chief suspects were Fidel Castro, the KGB, or
the Mafia. And while these theories were pushed, it was argued that the Warren
Commission, acting in haste, had perhaps erred in missing an assassin here or
there. But all this was framed as honest error.”
Shotz wrote, “In order to bolster
the government’s credibility, the government always needed some writers who
would argue that the Warren Report in fact had been true, that Oswald
was the lone assassin after all. Thus the ‘debate’ was broadened and
complicated, but the honor of the members of the Warren Commission was never
conceded by the government. It is important to understand that for the purposes
of the government it was not necessary that anyone actually be convinced that
these defenders of the Warren Report were correct. It was only necessary that
people believe that their writings were debatable, i.e., that there was some
substance to their arguments that Oswald was the lone assassin. If that point
could be debated, then the government was safe, because the criminal conspiracy
of the government of the United States
Thank you for setting us straight on that point Martin.
And so the debate continues and there is no Justice for JFK,
at least there is none in the Department of Justice of the government of the United
States
The same fear exhibited by the resignation of the Texas DA
is personified by the Justice Department officials who refuse to abide by the
Constitution, follow the evidence where ever it leads and prosecute those
suspected of having committed crimes related to the assassination of President
Kennedy.
“As a general policy,” former Justice Department official
Ben Civiletti testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations
(HSCA) in its last session, “the Department of Justice seldom turns down at
least exploring, or reviewing a petition or reasonable request,…(and)…to some
extent it becomes a matter of public will…but also a matter of
judgment that falls within the duties of any particular department or
agency of government…as to how far questions…can be explored to a useful or
fruitful purpose.”
When John T. Orr, Jr.
Chief of the Anti-Trust Division’s Atlanta Office, received the
Distinguish Service Award from the Attorney General he presented a paper that called
attention to the fact that the bullet fragments from the floor of President
Kennedy’s limo had not been tested for DNA ,
and he vigorously pushed for it and got it! (That deserves an exclamation point)
According to an official DOJ memo, “We met with Mr. Orr,
while he was in Washington
“Jurisdiction. Federal criminal statutes covering the assassination of the President and assaults against federal officials generally were enacted after 1963. Accordingly, the criminal statutes ofTexas Texas
“...It is our view that the Department has retained investigative jurisdiction over the assassination, though such investigation is restricted to activities which are not based upon the expectation of an eventual federal prosecution. Thus, the examination of evidence in federal possession is seemingly appropriate, while obtaining evidence by grand jury subpoena would likely be inappropriate. This position was adopted by the Division and endorsed b the Office of the Deputy Attorney General when we declined to seek a court order for exhumation of former Governor Connally’s body following allegations that bullet fragments remaining in his body from the incident would reveal, by weight or composition, the existence of additional bullets.”
“Jurisdiction. Federal criminal statutes covering the assassination of the President and assaults against federal officials generally were enacted after 1963. Accordingly, the criminal statutes of
“...It is our view that the Department has retained investigative jurisdiction over the assassination, though such investigation is restricted to activities which are not based upon the expectation of an eventual federal prosecution. Thus, the examination of evidence in federal possession is seemingly appropriate, while obtaining evidence by grand jury subpoena would likely be inappropriate. This position was adopted by the Division and endorsed b the Office of the Deputy Attorney General when we declined to seek a court order for exhumation of former Governor Connally’s body following allegations that bullet fragments remaining in his body from the incident would reveal, by weight or composition, the existence of additional bullets.”
So the Department of Justice “retains investigative
jurisdiction over the assassination, but restricts activities which are not
based upon the expectation of an eventual prosecution,” and that’s even if they
develop evidence of conspiracy or crimes related to the assassination.
1) NEW YORK DAILY
NEWS THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 2013 A federal prosecutor
in Texas has quit a major case against the Aryan Brotherhood
allegedly over fear for his life after the targeted slayings of two other
prosecutors, the latest of which occurred on Saturday. [ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/texas-prosecutor-quits-case-aryan-brotherhood-citing-security-article-1.1307426
PHILIP
CAULFIELD /
2) See: 1929 Atlantic City
3) Civilitti, Benjamin. HSCA
Testimony
4) Schotz. History Will Not Absolve Orwellian Control, Public Denial,
and the Murder of President Kennedy by E. Martin Schotz
and the Murder of President Kennedy by E. Martin Schotz
The Pseudo-Debate http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/HWNAU/contents.html
5) Orr Test Request of WCE-567
Yeah, you sure talk tough for a frigging little Blogger Boy. Why don't you get off your ass and go after them then? Talk is easy and that is all you do. Waaaah! Waaah! Waaaaah! And cry like a baby too. Bwaaaah! Bwaaaaah! Bwaaaah! What a pussy!
ReplyDelete