Embedded
w/ Snipers
By
William Kelly
“In a
free society, counter-espionage is based on the practice most useful for
hunting rabbits. Rather than look for the rabbit, one posts oneself in a spot
where the rabbit is likely to pass."
- Alexander Hamilton (as attributed by Allen Dulles)
- Alexander Hamilton (as attributed by Allen Dulles)
The lead
Humvee in the convoy suddenly comes to a halt as it slips under a tree on the
edge of town, an empty tin can, hanging from a branch by a thread, dangles in
the breeze.
To the
untrained eye it is an empty tin can hanging from a tree, but to the trained
eye it’s a sure sign of danger – a makeshift wind gauge, a sniper’s wind gauge,
indicating a Level 2 or Level 3 sniper is operating in the area and they were
about to enter the sniper’s kill zone.
When
Uncle Sam contacted me for a special mission recently, I answered the call and
spent a few weeks in the field helping to train American soldiers, including
expert snipers, from whom I learned some things that can be applied to a better
understanding of the mechanics of what happened at Dealey Plaza on November 22,
1963.
Before
trying to figure out who the Sixth Floor Sniper was and why he did the things
he did, a few things must be understood about the nature of the sniper
profession.
Not a
new idea, the historical development of the sniper as a key surgeon in the
course of battle has only been perfected in the last half of the twentieth
century.
During
the Revolutionary War, at the Battle of Brandywine, near Philadelphia, a
British sniper had General George Washington in his sights, but decided not to
shoot him in the back as he thought it ungentlemanly to do so, thus sparing the life of the
man who would be the first president of the American republic.
At
Saratoga, a few months later, an American sniper with a Kentucky long rifle
shot and killed a British general, decisively altering the outcome of not only
that battle but the war.
On
eighteen and nineteenth century war ships, the marines were issued long barrel
rifles and placed in high mast nests from where they would shoot select targets
during battles, so friendly forces were forced to wear identifying marks on
their hats so not to be accidentally hit by the marine marksmen.
As European
gunsmiths refined the rifle and ammo, the abilities of marksmen increased,
though applying the weapon for assassination purposes didn’t become
effective until World War II, and increased steadily through the Korean War and Vietnam, when the sniper came
into his own.
Snipers
played pivotal roles on the Russian front during World War II, and refined
their abilities in Korea, but it wasn’t until Vietnam (1965-1973) when the
Level One sniper came into his own, especially recruited, trained, equipped and
sent into the field on specific missions.
Historically
snipers were responsible for killing mobster Bugsy Siegel, civil rights activist
Medgar Evers, and the Texas Tower murders, as well as failed attempts to kill
Charles deGaul and Fidel Castro.
Traditionally snipers have been measured by the ultimate yardstick – confirmed kills, as well as the longest shot, most difficult shot and high target value.
Traditionally snipers have been measured by the ultimate yardstick – confirmed kills, as well as the longest shot, most difficult shot and high target value.
As for confirmed kills, there is Simo Hayha on top,
and no one else really close. Although relatively unknown outside of his native
Finnland, where he is a national hero, you can thank Hayha for popularizing the
Olympic sport that combines cross country skiing and accurate shooting, as
that’s the way he attacked and killed over seven hundred invading Russians in
1939.
A lone wolf with no military chain of command, Hayha
used his intimate knowledge of the terrain to attack and evade the Soviets, who
kept track and confirmed his kills and sent Level 1 sniper teams and eventually
a hole brigade to stop him.
Following Hayha, there’s a Fyodor Okhlopkova, a World
War II Russian sniper with 423 kills, and Francis Pegahmagabow, a Canadian
native American Indian scout and sniper credited with 378 kills during World
War I.
A World War II German, Matthaus Hetzenauer comes in
at number four with 345 kills, while his Russian front antagonists Lyudmila
Pavlichenko (309 kills) a women, is fifth on the all time snipers list.
Vasikly Zaytsev, who shared Lee Harvey Oswald's nickname – “the Rabbit,” (242 kills) is
sixth, and probably one of the best known snipers thanks to the movie “Enemy at
the Gate,” which depicted the personal battle between the best German and
Russian snipers during World War II. Zaytsev went on to instruct snipers at a special school he established and his students were known as "little rabbits" and accounted for another 3,000 confirmed kills.
Red Chinese sniper Zhang Tyaofang (214 kills) fought
in Korea, is number seven.
The Americans don’t rank until number 8 with Chris
Kyle, a US Navy SEAL whose 160 confirmed kills during the Iraq war just outrank
Australian Billy Sing, whose 150 kills during World War I and American Adelbert
F. Waldron II, whose 109 kills in Vietnam round out the top ten snipers of all
time.
Two other American Marines deserve notice however,
as Chuck Mawhinney (103 kills) and Carlos Hathcock (93 kills) in Vietnam are
almost celebrities, as the USMC has an award named after Hathcock, while
Mawhinney is known for being humble about his achievements, as not even his
wife, family or friends knew of his Vietnam exploits until they were revealed
in a book over twenty years later.
Top Twelve Snipers of All Time - Based on Confirmed Kills
Top Twelve Snipers of All Time - Based on Confirmed Kills
1-
Simo
Hayha – 705 kills (505 w/ rifle) Finnland 1939 WWII
2-
Fyodor
Okhlopkov – 423 kills – Russian WWII
3-
Francis
Pegahmagabow – 378 kills - Canadian WWI
4-
Matthaus
Hetzenauer – 345 kills – German WWII
5-
Lyudmila
Pavlichenko – 309 kills - Ukraine WWII
6-
Vasikly
Zaytsev – the rabbit - German 242 kills WWII
7-
Zhang
TYaofang – 214 kills Chinese - Korea
8-
Chris
Kyle – 160 kills – US Navy SEAL – Iraq War
9-
Billy
Sing – 150 + Australian during WWI
10- Adelbert F. Waldron III – 109
kills US Navy/Army 1968 Vietnam
11- Chuck Mawhinney – 103 kills USMC
1968
12- Carlos Hathcock – 93 kills USMC
1968
Longest
Shot
As for
the longest shot, the long standing record once held by Canadian Corporal Rob
Furlong – 2,430 meter (1.51 miles) was recently eclipsed by Craig Harrison, of
the Royal Marines at 2,475 meters.
Carlos
Hathcock is said to have taken the most difficult shot ever, killing an enemy
sniper by shooting him through his scope as he was aiming at Hathcock. Waldron
once shot an enemy sniper in a tree from a moving boat, and an American in Iraq made a successful shot through a brick
wall.
According to the snipers, Oswald is a Level Three sniper who is officially credited with making the most difficult shot of all time at the highest priority target, and that's why they don't believe it.
According to the snipers, Oswald is a Level Three sniper who is officially credited with making the most difficult shot of all time at the highest priority target, and that's why they don't believe it.
Level
One – the Specially Trained Sniper
The most
dangerous sniper is the one who is individually selected, trained and equipped
with an accurate sniper rifle outfitted with a modern scope, night vision
device and thermal imager, an expert trained to select key personnel as their
target and can hit the bull’s eye accurately at great ranges (1,000+ meters).
These
snipers are accompanied by a spotter-security aide and are skilled in avoiding
detection. This sniper is the most difficult to effectively counter.
The
Level One sniper doesn't take multiple shots at a target when one shot is all
that’s needed. As they say, “One shot one kill,” is their motto.
This
level sniper is portrayed in the Hollywood movie “The Shooter," which
exemplifies the training, discipline, pride and professionalism exhibited by
expert snipers at this level.
Level
Two Snipers
Level
Two Snipers are trained marksmen, often found in the national armies
of the world and commonly utilized in urban combat, equipped with a standard
issue weapon and with fair to good field craft skills, he is difficult to
detect. May be deployed alone or in teams, with women snipers effective against
the Nazis on the Russian front during World War II.
The
Level Three Sniper
The
Level Three sniper is the armed irregular, with little or no formal military
training, who may or may not wear a distinguishing uniform, and may or may not
carry his weapon openly. He will go to great lengths to avoid identification as
a sniper.
The 6.5 mm Manlicher Carcano with cheap Japanese scope and custom US Air Force holster sling (Where did Oswald get the sling?)
The gunsmith at Klines Sporting Goods in Chicago who mounted the scope on the rifle recently came out and acknowledged that Oswald got "very, very lucky," if in fact he used that gun to kill Kennedy.[ http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=226036]
The
Sixth Floor Sniper, whether it was Lee Harvey Oswald or someone else, would be
classified a Level Three Sniper by his weapon – the Mannlicher Carcano, a
standard issue Italian weapon, and if Oswald, by his limited US Marine Corps
training.
Winchester Model 70 - Circa 1963
Winchester Model 70 - Circa 1963
As
explained to me, a Level One sniper wouldn’t use that weapon and wouldn’t need
or take more than one shot. In 1963, a Level One sniper would probably use a
state of the art custom weapon and scope, or a prized Winchester Model 70 [http://en.wikipedia.og/wiki/Winchester_Model_70][ or Remington Model 700 rifle [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_700], top of the line models.
Remington Model 700 - Circa 1963
Since the weapon and MO – modus operandi – identifies the Sixth Floor Sniper as a
Level Three Sniper, Level One snipers say the Sixth Floor Sniper probably
didn’t take the fatal head shot that killed President Kennedy.
There
are also indications that the bullet that struck JFK in the head was a
different type of bullet than those fired from the Mannlicher Carcano, and that
shot was probably taken by a Level One sniper with a different style of weapon,
different type of bullet from a different location.
From the
Sixth Floor sniper’s nest, the best shot was when the target was approaching
the window on Houston Street, as it slowed down for the turn onto Elm Street,
and from then on the shots get harder, as the target moves from left to right
on a downward slope and interference by a tree.
The U.S.
Army Sniper’s Manual says under Engaging Moving Targets that: “Engaging moving
targets not only requires the Sniper to determine the target distance and wind
effects on the round, but must also consider the lateral and speed angle of the
target, the rounds time of flight, and the placement of a proper level to
compensate for both. These added variables increase the chance of a miss.
Therefore, the Sniper should engage a moving target when it is the only
option.” [www.cybersniper.com]
To
calculate leads, you take the Time of Flight (in seconds) x (times) target
speed (in feet per seconds) which equals = lead (in feet) x (times) .3048 =
meters x 1000 = mil. lead divided by range.
Of
course familiarity with the weapon and practice shooting at moving targets
increases the ability and skill of the shooter, but if Oswald was the Sixth
Floor Sniper there is no indication that he ever shot that rifle before, didn’t
practice or even purchase ammo for it.
As Lee
Harvey Oswald’s brother Robert, who was familiar with his shooting abilities
said, “If Lee did not spend a considerable amount of time practicing with that
rifle in the weeks and months before the assassination, then I would say that
Lee did not fire the shots that killed President Kennedy and wounded Governor
Connally.” (p. 208, “Lee – A Portrait of
Lee Harvey Oswald by his Brother, Coward-McCann, Inc., NY, 1967)
For the
Fiftieth anniversary of the assassination, the gunsmith at Kline’s in Chicago
who placed the scope on Oswald’s rifle was interviewed and quoted in a news
article saying that if Oswald used that rifle and scope he was “very lucky,”
and the snipers agree.
All of
the snipers agree that whoever fired those shots with that rifle from the Sixth
Floor window he did not use the scope, which was not properly aligned and not
necessary at that distance, where the manual sight would be sufficient.
While
the Sixth Floor sniper didn’t take the best shot from that location, as the
nearly stationary target came towards him, the head shot was most probably
taken by a Level One Sniper from either in front or behind so there was no
lateral movement as the target came towards or was going away from him.
From
what the Level One snipers tell me, the purpose of the Sixth Floor Sniper was
to provide diversion and deception, put ballistic evidence incriminating Oswald
into the car while the Level One sniper did what such snipers are trained to do
– kill the high priority target (HPT) with one shot.
They say
the Sixth Floor Sniper, whoever he was, was a Level Three sniper and his
standard issue weapon, while capable of firing three shots in the allotted time
and get out of three hits on target, was incapable of taking the fatal head
shot from that position with that weapon. Not a “lucky” shot, it couldn’t
happen. So there must have been a Level One sniper who took the fatal head shot
from another location, using a different type of weapon and ammo, and stationed
in front of or behind the target.
Integral
aspects of the Level One sniper attack, the diversion and deception not only
ensures the escape of the sniper and his spotter, but also protects the actual
sponsors, as one of the reasons for using a sniper to commit an assassination is
permit the escape of the shooter and to protect the sponsor.
The diversion
and deception were needed because there would be limited suspects if a Level
One sniper killed the President with only one shot, incriminating those few
military and intelligence agencies capable of putting a Level One sniper in the
field and taking out the highest priority target in the world without getting caught.
The Level Three sniper firing openly at the same time diverted attention from
the Level One sniper, expanded the suspect pool in general and incriminated
Oswald in particular.
In the
Marines Oswald’s nickname was “Ozzie Rabbit,” which they said was based on a
cartoon character popular at that time, and like Alice goes Through the Looking
Glass and into the Rabbit’s Hole to begin her adventure, those who devised the
Dealey Plaza operation incorporated Oswald, not as the real assassin or the Sixth
Floor sniper, but as the patsy and rabbit that would be set loose to set a
false trail and keep the official investigators from the real perpetrators of
the crime.
In his
book, “A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza,”
Craig Roberts concurs saying, “I analyzed the scene as a sniper,….(and
concluded)…it would take a minimum of two people shooting. There was little
hope that I alone, even if equipped with precision equipment, would be able to
duplicate the feat described by the Warren Commission,” so neither could Lee
Harvey Oswald, or any Level Three sniper.
“I would
have never put anyone in the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) with so many
locations that were much more advantageous,” Roberts said, “unless I needed a
diversion. If I did, it would be a good place for red herrings to be observed
by witnesses.”
As seen
from the street below, the Sixth Floor Sniper, according to all witnesses who
saw him, wore a white shirt (Oswald wore brown), and according to one witness
(Amos Eunis) who got a clear view of him, the sniper in the window had a very
distinctive bald spot on the top of his head, not a physical characteristic
shared by Oswald. Like Oswald, the Sixth Floor Sniper probably had good reason
to be there, possibly worked in the building or as a subcontractor or delivery
person familiar with the area, one who it wouldn’t seem suspicious for other
employees to see him there.
Nor did
he leave immediately, as the Warren Commission Report has Oswald running down
four flights of stairs to get to the Second Floor lunchroom in time to be seen
there by Dallas Police officer Marion Baker ninety seconds after the last shot.
The Sixth Floor Sniper took his time, did not run, and instead, as the photo evidence proves, he moved boxes
around, putting one on the window sill that was mistakenly believed to have
been used as a gun rest. He was still in the window nearly four to five minutes
after the shooting when seen by a secretary from across the street. If not a
TSBD employee or contractor, the Sixth Floor Sniper was possibly a police or
sheriff’s officer who just stayed nearby and blended in with the other
investigators when they began a search of the building.
This
sniper’s analysis is supported by the 1998 report by U.S. Attorney John Orr
that indicates the bullet that hit JFK in the head was a different type of
bullet than CE399 and other bullets fired from the Mannlicher Carcano rifle
found in the TSBD. Orr’s important report convinced the Department of Justice,
the FBI, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and
Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) to conduct further tests of CE567,
bullet fragments from the limo, no mean feat.[ http://jfkcountercoup2.blogspot.com/2012/03/re-wc-ce-567-bullet-fragment-found.html]
Like the
snipers, when a veteran deer hunter visited Dealey Plaza he was immediately
drawn to the area behind the picket fence on the Grassy Knoll and said that’s
where he would set up his deer stand.
But a
Level One sniper could take that fatal head shot from hundreds of yards away,
tucked back in a room away from the window so that no one could see him. Level
One snipers are the most difficult to detect and to counter.
According
to the Canadian Army Sniper Manual, the best way to stop a sniper is for
another sniper to kill him. The manual says: “The best way to stop the sniper
is to kill the sniper. Let them escape and they will attack someone else,
somewhere else.”
Counter-snipers
are instructed to “Have a plan and rehears it. Do Not fixate on casualties!
Kill the sniper, then attend to casualties.”
When
under fire the response policy is to keep moving, get out of the Kill Zone as
quickly as possible and move in a swerving S or Z pattern, identify the
sniper’s location, return fire, maneuver, attack and kill them. “Do not fixate
on casualties, kill the sniper!”
Although
Will Greer, the Secret Service driver was trained in these same procedures he
inexplicably slowed down after the first shot and came to almost a complete
stop precisely at the moment the head shot was taken. A Protestant Irishman
from Northern Ireland, Agent Greer was an Orangeman who belonged to the secret
order that fought the IRA and worked closely with the British MI5 and MI6
intelligence agencies.
Ian
Fleming, in the short story “The Living
Daylights,” has 007 assigned to kill a sniper expected to try to shoot a
defector running across the no-man’s land at the Berlin Wall, and James Bond is
surprised to see through his scope a beautiful women sniper, and he is
reprimanded when he only wounds and doesn’t kill her.
The
President’s security sometimes included counter-sniper snipers. Such
precautions were taken a few weeks before Dallas when the President visited
Tampa and traveled through the city in a similar motorcade, and over a dozen
Tampa Sheriff’s deputies were deployed with rifles on roofs along the motorcade
route. But no such precautions were taken in Dallas.
It has
been alleged (by Penn Jones), that Dallas Deputy Sheriff Weatherford was on the
Records Building roof overlooking Dealey Plaza with a rifle at the time of the
assassination, and there are published reports he returned fire. But
Weatherford’s official statement reflects that he was on the Houston Street
sidewalk with other deputies. Weatherford said that he was with Deputy Allan
Sweatt, whose statement confirms Weatherford’s story that they ran to the
Grassy Knoll before entering the back of the TSBD and searched the building.
Weatherford
assisted in the search of the sixth floor that discovered the shells and the
rifle, but failed to find Oswald’s clipboard, and he also participated in the
search of the Paine’s house and garage when the backyard photos were found
depicting Oswald holding the murder weapons and communist publications, which was part of the cover-story, a failed black propaganda operation that attempted to blame the assassination on Fidel Castro.
Fidel Castro with sniper rifle
Fidel Castro with sniper rifle
Just as
the dangling tin can was sign indicating there was a sniper operating in the
area, there were similar signs of danger before JFK entered Dealey Plaza, but
they went unheeded or were intentionally ignored.
Of the
Dealey Plaza danger signs, a few stand out, especially those who expressed
foreknowledge of the assassination, the Walker shooting, the recorded Alpha 66
threat, the Stevenson incident and Umbrella Man.
While
each of these danger signs should be reviewed in depth, the Umbrella Man was right
there at Dealey Plaza, and he admits that his umbrella was intended to be a
sign – a silent protest, a signal and message that President Kennedy would
recognize and understand – a sign that referred to his father’s isolationist
stand at the beginning of World War II, the image of Chamberlain’s umbrella at Munich that represented the failed policy of “appeasement” with the Nazis, which the
Umbrella Man implied was JFK’s policy towards communists.
Louie Steven Witt, a Dallas insurance office worker who claimed to be the Umbrella Man, told the HSCA that the umbrella was a visual protest of JFK’s father’s policies of appeasement of Hitler at Munich when he was ambassador to the UK (1938-39), with the umbrella being a reference to Nevelle Chamberlain. Witt told the HSCA that it was someone in his insurance office - the Rio Grande National Insurance Co., told him that the Kennedys were sore about the umbrella being used as protest sign. “I was going to use the umbrella to heckle the president’s motorcade….I just knew it was a sore sport with the Kennedys. I just knew the vague generalities of it. It had something to do with something that happened years ago with the father Joe Kennedy when he was the Ambassador to England.”
The Umbrella Man at Dealey Plaza
Louie Steven Witt, a Dallas insurance office worker who claimed to be the Umbrella Man, told the HSCA that the umbrella was a visual protest of JFK’s father’s policies of appeasement of Hitler at Munich when he was ambassador to the UK (1938-39), with the umbrella being a reference to Nevelle Chamberlain. Witt told the HSCA that it was someone in his insurance office - the Rio Grande National Insurance Co., told him that the Kennedys were sore about the umbrella being used as protest sign. “I was going to use the umbrella to heckle the president’s motorcade….I just knew it was a sore sport with the Kennedys. I just knew the vague generalities of it. It had something to do with something that happened years ago with the father Joe Kennedy when he was the Ambassador to England.”
The Umbrella Man at Dealey Plaza
Who
planted the seed in Witt’s mind to heckle the president? Perhaps it was someone
who also shared an office in the Rio Grande building, - which included the
Secret Service, Army Intelligence and the Emigration and Naturalization
Service, where Oswald visited numerous times. Witt’s references to
Chamberlain’s umbrella and appeasement at Munich are echoed exactly by General
LeMay at the White House a year earlier.
Chamberlain - Appeasement at Munich
At the
height of the Cuban Missile Crisis, on October 19, 1962, President Kennedy met
in the Oval Office with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when Air Force Chief Gen.
Curtis LeMay was recorded as saying, “…I don’t see any other solution for it
[other than direct military action].….This is almost as bad as the appeasement
at Munich.(Pause)...” Sheldon Stern: “The general had gone well
beyond merely giving advice or even disagreeing with his Commander-in-chief. He
had taken his generation’s ultimate metaphor for shortsightedness and
cowardice, the 1938 appeasement of Hitler at Munich, and flung it in the
President’s face. President Kennedy, in a remarkable display of sang froid,
refused to take the bait; he said absolutely nothing.”
A few
minutes later JFK did reply to LeMay’s remark that, “…In other words, you’re in
a pretty bad fix at the present time.”
“What
did you say?” Kennedy asked.
“You’re
in a pretty bad fix,” LeMay repeated. And in a response that the Miller
Center’s transcriptionists got wrong, JFK told LeMay that, “You’re in it with
me.”
And the
pretty bad fix that JFK and LeMay were in together then was not about Munich
but Cuba.
Then, as
JFK entered Dealey Plaza and the sniper’s Kill Zone, the Umbrella Man's sign
may have been the last thing Kennedy saw before his head was shattered by a
bullet fired by a Level One sniper who was not Lee Harvey Oswald.
If my research is correct Boris Pash was the planner,Othar Shalikashvili was leval one sniper and his brother John part of take out
ReplyDeleteBill,
ReplyDeleteI was looking for something on the internet to get me/keep me interested in JFK's murder. I read JFK Facts at least daily and I listen to Black Ops Radio weekly. But Bill you hit another homerun with this article, Dealey Plaza - View from the Sniper's Nest & Klein's Gunsmith says, If LHO did it he was very, very lucky." I thought that I had read almost every one of your articles but apparently I haven't. I'm going to have to read all of these articles. I like baseball and I like a pitcher's duel, but I like when you come to bat as it seems that your either on base or hitting a three-run homer. Please continue your great work. Bob Truitt
Mr. Kelly,
ReplyDeleteI have always enjoyed your editorial articles, as they are well composed, and of coarse, they always hit the nail right on the head.
With regard to the afore mentioned article, I would agree with the assessment of the Kill Box, or Kill Zone(as we used to call it), by those snipers whom you had interviewed. One of the few schools the Army had that I did not have opportunity to attend, was the Sniper School. However, having read the FM Manual on the subject(including the newest revision), I no doubt agree with their assessments.
Now, as they say, "on with the show!"
I have most recently, been addressing the Dillard photograph taken of the TSBD building, only seconds(about 30 seconds or so) following the last shot. In that photo, I have identified not one, but TWO persons standing next to the "snipers nest" window. As most well know, there is also another unidentified person in the far west window of the sixth floor. the fact that there are TWO people in the window next to the "snipers nest," only attests to the fact that there most obviously was an conspiracy! No doubt, anyone and everyone located on the sixth floor at the time of the shooting, was complicit in the assassination. my assessment of those persons in the window in question, is that Lee Oswald is NOT one of them! In fact(pure conjuncture on my part) my observation of the dark hared person located to the left(viewers right)closest to the open window, was that of a man wearing glasses( my educated guess, based on evidence produced years later, is deduced by the identification of latent fingerprints, as well as eye witness testimony!). I believe that man to be Mac Wallace. As for the lighter haired individual facing the window: this man is standing back, away from the window. Judging by the angle of his head and his height in the window, I believe he is standing on a box of books, so as to see down below at the base of the building, but back away from the window enough as to (presumably) not be seen from outside!
Regardless: there are TWO people in that window!
Who is this man? Well, he looks(to myself anyway) to be E. Howard Hunt. However, that can't be possible, as I also believe that hunts image was captured in another photograph at a different location at about that same time, showing him crossing the plaza from the direction of Houston and Main, crossing the street (Elm) toward the knoll!
None the less: there is someone....other than Oswald, standing in that window!
Sorry to say: At this point in time, all ANYONE can do..All that we can do, is speculate as to who, what, where, how, and when! As far as evidence is concerned; everything from the Zapruder film, to every other piece of evidence, has either been tainted, or has had the chain of evidence altered in such a way, as to be rendered inadmissible in a court of law!
Essentially, at the end of the day, I'm afraid that the only thing left by us to history, is speculation! However, the house Committee on Assassinations did rule that there was a conspiracy! Some consolation!
But, for what it is really worth: I'll still keep playing with this, as a cat with a mouse, "...not because it is easy, but because it is hard! And I will continue to..."this, that, and the other thing," because I think it is right!
Check out the Dillard photo. Not one, but TWO! dm