Chess Game or War? Our Next Moves on the Devil's Chessboard

 

Chess Game or War? Our Next Moves on the Devil's Chessboard

If we are at war against the national security military industrial covert intelligence complex - NSMICIC in military talk, it's not like chess, a game in which gentlemen play according to agreed upon rules. If it's war, all's fair in love and war. 

Since this game began on the clock in 1992, it has progressed for quite awhile, and the opposition's last move was to put us in check, though not checkmate. 

While there are no rules, we still have to live by the laws of the land, we can't murder each other, but we can throw a red flag and ask the umpires and judges to make a ruling on certain plays and actions, as is necessary in response to President Biden's June 30, 2023 declaration certifying that the National Archives has finished it's reviews of classified records within the JFK Collection at the Archives. 

That the NARA has concluded it's review of classified records was reported on May 1 by an Acting Archivist who has since left her post and has been replaced by a younger, easily manipulated women, so we know that there's someone behind them really calling the shots. And it's not Biden but his handlers, who like Radar in MASH, just need to get a signature without any explanations. 

NARA wants to wash their bloody hands of the whole JFK Act matter, but according to the law, the Archivist of the United States must be able to inform the President and the Congress that the last JFK assassination record has been released to the public. That's something that can't be said or done because the NARA stopped searching and seeking JFK assassination records that are in private hands, and even in another section of the Archives. They have just refused to live by their obligations clearly established under the JFK Act requiring them to assume the tasks that were previously performed by the now defunct Assassinations Records Review Board. Another key issue in this case. 

Bill Simpich and Larry Schnaps, representing the Mary Ferrell Foundation (MFF), filed a civil suit against President Biden and the NARA last October, 2022, and Simpich, Schnaps, and their cohorts, Mary Ferrell, Inc. Rex Bradford, J. Thompson, Gary Aguilar, et al., and David Talbot, are all rooks, knights and bishops on the good side of the Devil's Chessboard, and capable of making different and key moves in this Great Game. They should all be having their say at the MF Press Conference in San Francisco tomorrow, so we'll get to know what they have to say. 

This civil suit is finally coming to an end, so we will soon know - within 60 days, what the judge decides. And it will end in a BANG!, regardless of how the judge rules, as each way there are counter-moves that are already being contemplated by both sides. 

Although the judge has cancelled the Oral Arguments that were scheduled for Thursday afternoon, the MFF press conference will still be held today, Wednesday, and if not live streamed it will be taped and archived, and Jeff Morely at JFKFacts can probably keep everyone posted on this count. 

By canceling the Oral Arguments it appears that the judge has read what records have been submitted to him and the written arguments for both sides and after digesting it all, has already come to a reasonable conclusion without the knockout punch that a Oral Argument can sometimes make. 

Though there's a slim chance the judge, like the Archives bureaucrats, is just tired of all this and just accepts the move to dismiss so it's out of his hands. But I don't think that's the case. 

If the judge rules in favor of the Defendents - Biden and the Archives, and dismisses the case on the grounds that President Biden's "declaration" and the Acting Archivist's "certification" of the records, makes this case mute, then he does so without bothering to address the key issues in the case. They won't just go away. 

Dismissing the case against what we know will certainly imply that the judge is "on the take," or a puppet of the administration in Washington, and is not issuing his ruling based on the facts of the case, as presented. I don't believe that is the situation because the case was filed in San Francisco Federal Court not only because it's homecourt for the lead attorney for the Plantiffs Bill Simpich, but California courts have been known to be much more liberal and open to citizen's dissent that the more conservative East Coast DC Circuit Courts. 

Even if the judge moves to dismiss, that can be challenged, and I'm sure it will be, though it isn't the only active case in play, as the Nix case is also on the docket, and yet others are being contemplated. 

If the judge dismisses the case out right, and I don't think he will, it will inflame an already hot constituency that will begin pestering Congress to hold JFK Act Oversight Hearings, something that hasn't happened in over 20 years. And what better time to have it than after the NARA says it's done reviewing the records and is all over? 

Those archivist, reluctant to answer any of our questions, will then have to answer Congressmen's questions on the hot seat and under oath. 

In addition, a new bill before Congress - the JFK Act of 2023, as submitted to a number of key committees for deliberations, could suddenly come alive and though it is more specific and orders the withheld records released, it could just be the ticket, after complaints are reviewed and changes made to the proposed law. 

Another Congressional resolution to all of this would simply to make an Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) a permanent institution and responsible for records of all political assassinations in the USA. One of the responses the HSCA and ARRB investigators got from the CIA and FBI was that they would be gone in a year or two, while the CIA and FBI would always be there. 

So a permanent Assassination Records Review Board could be a viable answer, a Board with power and authority to release records, but recognize and withheld those that could harm out national security. 

If all of those possible remedies fail, then maybe democracy will play it's hand, as two of the current presidential candidates - Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have promised to release the remaining sealed records shortly into their administration. 

And once President they would necessarily have to appoint a new Archivist (AOTUS), one with open record beliefs, one with a strong backbone, and one with the ability to command those running the NARA JFK Collection to modernize their technology, put everything on line and issue a real guide to the collection, as required by law, but never delivered. 

If none of that works, this being love and war, there's always the black op, the black bag job, the B&E Mission Impossible action like the guys in Falcon and Snowman or Nicholas Cage in National Treasure, but instead of stealing the Declaration of Independence, release and feed to the press the remaining sealed JFK records. All that's needed is an inside man and a graveyard shift janitor. And maybe somebody is planning to do this. 

In any case, Biden and Company may have put us in check, but we have a number of moves we can make regardless of which way the judge rules in this case. And we have a number of key players in position to make the necessary moves, so I'm pretty confident that in the end, we will this war because of our love of the truth, and being involved in a fight thats a worthy cause. 

Billkelly3@gmail.com