Thursday, December 29, 2022

COINTELPRO and The Camden 28

 COINTELPRO AND THE CAMDEN 28

Jefferson Morley, in his December 6, 2022 presentation at the Mary Ferrell Press Conference at the National Press Club in Washington, said that the records released under the JFK Act indicate a strong interest in Lee Harvey Oswald by high level CIA officers while President Kennedy was still alive. He also said there is reason to believe Oswald was involved in a CIA operation before the assassination, one designed to discredit the Fair Play for Cuba Committee that was disbanded shortly after the assassination. In addition, Morley mentioned that this operation may have been a joint FBI-CIA COINTELPRO operation.

We only know about COINTELPRO because a group of anti-war activists, who called themselves the Citizens Committee to Investigate the FBI, broke into the Media, Pennsylvania FBI office and stole their files in the early 1970s. They then distributed the FBI documents to various media outlets, including the Washington Post, and the media recognized the COINTELPRO documents referred to the FBI’s activities against anti-Vietnam War groups.

Media is a small town just outside of Philadelphia, and is where Ruth and Michael Paine were married in 1959 in a Quaker ceremony just around the corner from the FBI office. Since the Media FBI office break-in was never solved, some of those involved, now that the statute of limitations had expired, to write a book about their experince.

But the COINTELPRO documents gave a clear indication as to how the FBI was trying to disrupt the anti-War activities, and the case of the Camden 28 provides an adequate example of that.

Camden is a city across the Delaware River from Philadelphia, and the Camden 28, in the early 1970s, were active anti-war protesters, nominally lead by Father Michael Doyle, an Irish born Catholic priest who was my Religion teacher at Camden Catholic High School and recently died.  If I hadn’t been away at college I probably would have been among them when they broke into the Camden Federal Building and began to steal the military draft records, mine included.

One of the Camden 28 was Robert “Bob” Hardy, an ex-US Marine Corps veteran who was also an FBI informant. Hardy had a truck, provided the ladders, glass cutters and tools, provided by the FBI, and it can be said that the break-in cold not have happened if it wasn’t for the assistance of Bob Hardy and the FBI.

Of course, in the middle of the heist, the FBI, state and local police, including my father, a Camden Police Lieutenant at the time, closed in and arrested them all. When the case got to court, it became clear that Hardy was an FBI informant, and was to provide stats evidence.

As accurately portrayed in the documentary film The Camden 28, by Antholy Giacchino in 2007, in the middle of the trial, Bob Hardy’s son was tragically killed in an accident, and Father Doyle and the rest of the Camden 28 forgave him and sympathized with his plight, so much so that he defected from the FBI and became a witness for the defense. That led to their being found not-guilty.

[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camden_28_(film)    ]

[   https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0808190/?ref_=ext_shr_em ]

The COINTELPRO documents from the Media, FBI office, and the story of the Camden 28 clearly how the COINTELPRO operations worked, and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, with its domestic and foreign attributes, support Morley’s contention that the COINTELPRO operation to discredit the FPCC was a joint FBI-CIA operation.

We know the CIA was involved because of the records that show David Atlee Phillips was part of it, as this document, released in the December15th 2022 batch, clearly indicates.

 [  https://m.facebook.com/photo.php/?fbid=10227561547759826 ]

Anthony Giacchino, director of The Camden 28, also directed The Kennedy Assassination: 24 Hours After (2009), that chronicles the first 24 hours after the assassination, but leaves out a lot of key elements.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1549069/  ]

In any case, the COINTELPRO documents from the Media FBI office and the story of the Camden 28 both reinforce the idea that Oswald – a Bob Hardy type of individual, was involved in a joint FBI-CIA operation to discredit the FPFCC in the months leading up to the assassination. 

Friday, December 23, 2022

Assassination Records Not in the JFK Collection

  NOTE: This will be continually updated with new cases, footnotes and links. 

 

Bill Kelly – Originally posted on 12 October, 2017

Missing JFK Assassination Records – Revised and Updated

The Black Hole at the Archives – Top Fifty Missing Assassination Records not in the JFK Collection at the National Archives.

By William Kelly

“I do think identifying the missing assassination records is an important project, not because I think we can make the documents appear, but so we can help make this sleeping nation more aware that America has a deep history.”  – Peter Dale Scott

 

The list of missing artifacts, records and documents from ostensibly secure Archives is growing – especially JFK assassination records.

If Peter Dale Scott‘s “Negative Template” theory is correct, what is missing from the extant history is more significant than what is in the documentary record.

As researcher Malcolm Blunt has said, “It’s amazing we have anything left. It’s sickening, just sickening, and a disgrace, an absolute disgrace. The ARRB should have pressured these people into doing a proper search for all of the records.”

This list began when, during a March 2017 press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, I asked Federal Judge John Tunheim if anyone was looking for missing assassination records such as the AF1 tapes and ONI records.

Judge Tunheim shrugged and John Newman said to me, “You are.”

So if it’s up to me I’m going to start looking by making a list of them and prioritizing them as to most significant and easiest to find.

In a private conversation afterwards Judge Tunheim gave me his card and asked me to send him a list and he would look into it.

And this list may be included in the Mary Ferrell-Bill Simpich civil suit against President Biden and the National Archives for not enforcing the JFK Act of 1992.

I began the list with the CIA OS Volume Five file on Lee Harvey Oswald, as it was found missing by Malcolm Blunt and given some publicity.

1)      Oswald CIA Office of Security File Volume 5, last seen by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA).

2)      Files of the first chief council to HSCA Richard Sprague, who took his files home with him when he was fired for conducting a real investigation. The Assassinations Records Review Board (ARRB), responsible for identifying and obtaining records, missed them because they confused the attorney Richard Sprague with the computer programmer of the same name whose extensive files on the assassination are part of the JFK Collection. Sprague’s HSCA files, paid for by taxpayers that rightfully belong at the Archives, are currently in Sprague’s Philadelphia law office.

3)      Soviet KGB records of Oswald’s time in Moscow and Minsk that were obtained by Norman Mailer are now in the possession of Mailer’s former associate Lawrence Schiller, who refused to turn them over to the ARRB.

4)      Unedited AF1 Radio Transmission tapes from November 22, 1963. Two different edited versions of these tapes are available, one on cassette tapes released by the LBJ Library and a reel to reel version discovered among the personal effects of General Clifton. The White House Communications Agency (WHCA) is responsible for these tapes. As Vince Salandria has pointed out there was a transcript of the complete AF1 radio transmissions in the LBJ White House, where two reporters – T. H. White and William Manchester were permitted to read it and quote from it. They recount conversations not on either of the extant tapes. Pierre Salinger was given a copy of the unedited transcript and quoted from it, and said he returned it to the JFK Library in Boston, but no one there can find it.

5)      Dan Alcorn notes: Joan Mellen found that the Bruce-Lovett Report on the CIA covert operations, that Arthur Schlesinger mentions, is now missing from RFK’s files at the JFK Library. David Bruce was the OSS colonel who accompanied Hemingway to liberate Paris, later JFK’s ambassador to Court of St. James, while Lovett was on board of Moa Bay Mining Company in Cuba and the person who recommended Robert McNamara and McGeorge Bundy to JFK. It’s inconceivable their report on CIA operations is missing, but it is. Even the CIA now wants a copy, if you can find one.

6)      Most of the Zapruder film briefing boards made at NPIC on the day after the assassination are missing, though a few have been found.

7)      Peter Dale Scott wants the minutes of the Honolulu Conference of Nov. 20, 1963. “I consider this omission (even the fact of it) extremely important, not just for understanding the JFK assassination, but for understanding U.S. history. For example: The documents about the Honolulu Conference in the FRUS 1961-1963 Volume make no reference to North Vietnam. The first FRUS record to do so is FRUS Doc. 327 [SECRET]. Memo of Conversation Between Hilsman and Lodge, Nov. 24, 1963, 10 AM.[1]U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961-1963, Vol IV, 632, Doc. 327. Memo of Conversation Between Hilsman and Lodge, Nov. 24.  A SECRET/EYES ONLY second version follows as Doc. 328. There was also a third version, as we learn from this footnote 2 to Doc. 327: “2. Because of different distribution limitations, Hilsman made three separate memoranda of this conversation. The second is infra; the third was not declassified.”[2] U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961-1963, Vol IV, 632, Doc. 327. Memo of Conversation between Hilsman and Lodge, Nov. 24, 1963, 10 AM, fn. 2

8) Church Committee interviews with Gerry Patrick Hemming, Orestes Pena, Immigration and Naturalization Service and Customs officials, and other Church Committee testimony are missing.

9) U.S. Customs records on Cubans, especially by Cesar Diosdado, requested by the HSCA were so voluminous they couldn’t be given to the HSCA, but now consist of only a few records at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

10) The audio tape recording of Gaeton Fonzi’s interview with Mitch Werbell was erased and the transcript is missing, only Fonzi’s notes remain.

11) John Newman says that Eisenhower era reports on assassinations of foreign leaders that he copied years ago are now missing from the NARA, and he believes such records are being deliberately stolen.

12) Bill Simpich says that CIA Mexico City Station (MCS) cable to Headquarters from September 26-30, 1963 are missing as well as cables from CIA HQ to MCS, JMWAVE to HQ and HQ to JMWAVE cable traffic on the same dates, and all cable traffic between MCS and JMWAVE between September 26 and October 20 and November 22 to December 30, 1963 are missing.

13) The CIA’s “detailed” study of the July 20, 1944 attempt to kill Hitler to be adapted for use against Castro, as mentioned by Desmond FitzGerald in his September 23, 1963 briefing of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is missing, and was the subject of a FOIA lawsuit by the Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC).

14) Office of Naval Intelligence – ONI Defector File, as identified as an assassination record by Navy Lt. Com. T. Pike, but never turned over to the Archives. See: JFKCountercoup – The Railroading of Lt. Commander Terri Pike.

15) ONI 119 investigation reports on Oswald’s defection and the assassination, as referred to by the Navy investigators who wrote them and the officers who read them.

16) The assassination files of the Director of the ONI Rufus Taylor, whose office had undercover agents working in Jack Ruby’s Carousel Club, installing and maintain the sound system, who reported, in the only surviving document, that Oswald was seen in the club.

17) James Mastrovito – the Secret Service Agent responsible for the SS records on the assassination acknowledged to the ARRB that he “culled” – destroyed many records and flushed into a food processor a vial of material labeled “JFK brain – Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,” with no repercussions.

18) The Secret Service destroyed many records, including the Advance Reports for the Tampa trip after the JFK Act was passed by Congress, although copies of some of these records were found among the personal effects of Agent Gerald Blaine, who wrote the Tampa Advance report. Do other agents also have copies of official records among their personal effects? Is anyone looking?

19) The “Homme Report” from a Congressional subcommittee reportedly contains information on Robert F. Kennedy’s knowledge and approval of CIA plans to kill Fidel Castro.

21) Four boxes of witness testimony turned over to NARA in April 1965 by US Attorney now missing.

22) OSI – Office of Special Investigation military intelligence review of Oswald’s State Department file is missing.

23) When former US Marine officer Oliver Revill joined the FBI he reported on an investigation of Oswald and files on him at a US Marine base in North Carolina, records not in the public record.

24) The Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel had documents excluded from the Warren Commission, according to a memo sent to ARRB and NARA archivist Steve Tilly, “more stuff lost in the shuffle,” says Malcolm Blunt.

25) The ARRB tried to obtain Oswald’s New Orleans court records but were told they were accidentally destroyed when sent for microfilming.

26) Army Intelligence files on Oswald were kept from the Warren Commission and then “routinely” destroyed in 1973.

27) In 1976 when the CIA Counterintelligence (CI) staff were reviewing JFK assassination files the Security Office did not hand over their “secondary files” on Oswald, aka “research files,” that were not seen by HSCA or any other component of the CIA, as Malcolm Blunt says “they are like a whole separate agency.”

28) Larry Haapanen notes, White House Situation Room Incoming-Outgoing Message Log for 11/22/63-11/30/63 (the extant log for November 1963 ends abruptly on the morning of 11/2263).

29) Records of the Dallas-based 488th Military (Strategic) Intelligence Detachment (Counter-Intelligence) unit histories and rosters 1962-1963.30. Records of FBI wiretapping of Oswald while in police custody as well as post assassination taps of Ruth Paine and Michael Paine and Marina and Robert Oswald phones, as reported by Irving police Chief Paul Barger.]

30) Records of FBI wiretapping of Oswald while in police custody as well as post assassination taps of Ruth Paine and Michael Paine and Marina and Robert Oswald phones, as reported by Irving police Chief Paul Barger.

31) White House Communications Agency (WHCA) records for 11/22/63 including tape of Secret Service motorcade security radio “Charlie” channel that included Roy Kellerman talking as the third shot was fired, and radios in LBJ’s car, the AF1 cockpit and the WHCA base station at the Dallas Sheraton hotel.

32) Missing Mexico City records include LILYRIC (Soviet embassy photo records, Sept. ’63); LIFEAT (wiretap records, for all of 1963), daily resumen wiretap summaries for 1963, and records withheld by ARRB at request of CIA and FBI that may be released in the October 26, 2017 data dump.

33) Many relevant FBI 134 Informant records are missing or being withheld.

34) FBI dispatch tape of Dallas calls for 11/22/63 is missing.

35) The National Photo Interpretation Center (NPIC) report on their study of the Zapruder film and Art Lundal’s briefing of CIA Director John McCone is missing, though McCone told RFK that the CIA said there were two gunmen.

36) The JMWAVE NPIC records and other NPIC assassination records were, according to a NPIC secretary, boxed and at the orders of Robert Kennedy sent to the Smithsonian Institute instead of the NARA.

37) FBI’s Mexico City file MX 105-2137. Let me begin with the Board’s explanation of why this file, brought to their attention by me, was not seen by them.

38) Malcolm Blunt: FBI espionage “65” File on Oswald, Correspondence between Office of Security (Bruce Solie and David Slawson during WC investigation….second part of Bruce Solie HSCA Security Classified Testimony, full debriefs of INS and Customs officers at the Department of Justice following their testimony to the Church committee (all missing).

39) Mexico City Station to Headquarters (September 26–30, 1963); Headquarters to Mexico City Station (September 26–30, 1963); JMWAVE to Headquarters (September 26–November 21,1963); Headquarters to JMWAVE (September 26–November 21, 1963); and all traffic between the Mexico City Station and JMWAVE for the periods September 26–October 20, 1963 and November 22–December 30, 1963.

40) Records of the Dallas-based 488th Military Intelligence Detachment (Strategic) and 349th Military Intelligence Detachment (Counter-Intelligence) — for example unit histories and unit rosters from 1962-63.

John Armstrong: Bill, You might also want to include the following:

41) Employment records of LHO collected by the FBI from the Pfister Dental Lab have disappeared.

42) Stripling Junior High (Ft. Worth) records of LHO’s attendance in 1954, collected by the FBI, have disappeared.

43) The “original” US postal money order, allegedly used to pay for the MC rifle, has disappeared.

44) Documents relating to LHO’s discharge from the Marine Corp in March, 1959, reviewed by asst Provost Marshall William Gorsky at El Toro, CA., disappeared.

45) LHO’s Texas driver’s license (and file), seen and handled by numerous employees at the TDPS, disappeared.

46) The Oswald wallet, produced by Capt. Westbrook at 19th & Patton and shown to officers and FBI agent Barrett, was last seen in the hands of Capt. Westbrook.

47) Film taken of anti-Castro Cubans training in Louisiana, which also showed Oswald, has disappeared

48) All original NYC school records of LHO disappeared while in FBI custody. Only photographs remain in the National Archives.

49) FBI files on LHO in NYC from Sept, 1961- March, 1962

50) Interviews by Edward J. Epstein of US Marines who knew LHO in Japan, the Fulton Ousler Collection, kept for years at Georgetown University, are now missing.

51) Complete files of LHO’s attendance at radar school in Keesler (2 files with two different numbers; two different graduation dates; two different class numbers, etc).

52) Marine Corps unit diaries for LHO at El Toro, CA from December, 1958 thru March, 1959.

53) Interviews by John Hart Ely of Marines who knew LHO at El Toro, CA are missing.

54) All employment records of Marguerite Oswald from 1955 thru 1963.

55) SS records for Marina and LHO.

Monday, December 19, 2022

NARA DEC. 15, 2022 PRESS RELEASE

 https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/releashttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEiNNhDtmKssN6lSxFmdPPoQkcyOQpKDdrAp07dl3VwbNXilCaJjnfoIwfVzpWBK9mQ3yWI7VsNCk7Tu-5dXzcVCU6vyfYcJK4FUVT7ncsbanLPjeot2wRRJ9b7TWHAbrCVJOoDpj6gssfEw1IVY4x4USiZf3VljPZamOWBsjPa3Z01uBxcr2waZlQxS9IjBNtmkpKyWVAnluYtjBiaTUw3IpQ1Ke7_vmQ=s0-d-e1-ft - https://gallery.mailchimp.com/412503bf0e287fbfe1ff44ad5/images/054c4267-b88d-4944-b3ed-8e9ee3ec9082.pnge2022?_ga=2.78725650.70625580.1671127303-912431633.1670698736

You can also get to the recently released 2022 records by going to the following link:

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2022?_ga=2.78725650.70625580.1671127303-912431633.1670698736

Scroll to the right to get a link to a pdf file for each individual record, continue scrolling to find out who wrote the document and the subject it concerns. I will be compiling a list of some of the most interesting records and posting them soon. If you come across anything you think is special, please email me the RIF- Record Identification File number and a link or a copy of the document. Thank you. Bill Kelly 

 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION DEC. 15 PRESS RELEASE 

Update: Due to last minute additions, the actual number of documents containing newly released information is 13,173, not the number originally provided.

National Archives Releases New Group of JFK Assassination Documents

WASHINGTON, December 15, 2022 – In accordance with President Biden’s memorandum of December 15, 2022, the National Archives today posted 13,173, documents containing newly released information subject to the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Act). Released documents are available for download.

At the direction of the President, and following the December 15, 2021, release, the National Archives and the agencies responsible for withheld documents conducted an intensive review of each remaining redaction withheld under section 5 of the JFK Act. This was the first review under the JFK Act that was done in an interagency manner at the redaction level.

The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection (the Collection), established by the National Archives in November 1992, consists of approximately five million pages. The vast majority of the collection has been publicly available without restrictions on access since the late 1990s. Following today’s release, over 97% of records in the collection are now available.

As permitted under section 5 of the JFK Act, agencies appealed to the President to continue postponement of certain information beyond October 22, 2021. Section 5 of the JFK Act permits postponement for an identifiable harm to military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations where the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure. The President then provided agencies with a temporary certification until December 15, 2022, to allow for a review of all documents withheld in part under section 5 of the JFK Act and directed agencies “to ensure that the United States Government maximizes transparency, disclosing all information in records concerning the assassination, except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.” Today’s release is the result of that review. Section 5 postponement decisions now affect less than 4,400 documents in the Collection.

As of the December 15, 2021 release, all documents subject to section 5 of the JFK Act had been released in their entirety or in part, and no documents subject to section 5 of the JFK Act remained withheld in their entirety.

The Collection also includes 515 documents withheld in full and another 2,545 documents withheld in part under sections 10 and 11 of the JFK Act. Section 10 of the JFK Act addresses records withheld under court seal or for grand jury secrecy, and section 11 of the JFK Act addresses records subject to section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code or a deed governing access to or transfer or release of gifts or donations to the United States Government. Information subject to sections 10 and 11 of the JFK Act cannot be released independently by NARA, the agencies, or the President, though some of these documents also contain information postponed under section 5, which has been made available and posted today.

The National Archives and the Department of Justice are working together to determine whether  information in five records withheld in full under court seal or for grand jury secrecy under section 10 of the JFK Act can be released.

Also posted online today are the letters from agencies requesting postponement, agency indices, and agency transparency plans.

Online Resources:

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on the Temporary Certification Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection

Documenting the Death of a President

JFK Assassination Records Review Board

JFK Assassination Records FAQs

Warren Commission Report

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Presidential Memo - December 15, 2022

Biden punts to June 30, 2023

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/12/15/memorandum-on-certifications-regarding-disclosure-of-information-in-certain-records-related-to-the-assassination-of-president-john-f-kennedy/

December 15,

Memorandum on Certifications Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
 
SUBJECT:      Certifications Regarding Disclosure of
              Information in Certain Records Related to the
              Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Section 1.  Policy.  As set forth in the Presidential Memorandum of October 22, 2021 (Temporary Certification Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy) (2021 Memorandum), in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note) (the “Act”), the Congress declared that “all Government records concerning the assassination of President John F. Kennedy . . . should be eventually disclosed to enable the public to become fully informed about the history surrounding the assassination.”  The Congress also found that “most of the records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are almost 30 years old, and only in the rarest cases is there any legitimate need for continued protection of such records.”  In the 30 years since the Act became law, the profound national tragedy of President Kennedy’s assassination continues to resonate in American history and in the memories of so many Americans who were alive on that terrible day; meanwhile, the need to protect records concerning the assassination has weakened with the passage of time.  It is therefore critical to ensure that the United States Government maximizes transparency by disclosing all information in records concerning the assassination, except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.

Sec. 2.  Background.  (a)  The Act permits the continued postponement of disclosure of information in records concerning President Kennedy’s assassination only when postponement remains necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Since 2018, executive departments and agencies (agencies) have been reviewing under this statutory standard each redaction they have proposed that would result in the continued postponement of full public disclosure, with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) reviewing whether it agrees that each redaction continues to meet the statutory standard.  In my 2021 Memorandum, the Archivist of the United States (Archivist) explained that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the ability of agencies, including NARA, to conduct this review and comprehensive engagement, and the Archivist recommended that I temporarily certify the records for continued postponement for a limited period.  In the 2021 Memorandum, I directed the completion of an intensive 1-year review of each remaining proposed redaction to ensure that the United States Government maximizes transparency by disclosing all information in records related to the assassination, except in cases when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise. 

          (b)  Pursuant to my direction, agencies have undertaken a comprehensive effort to review the full set of almost 16,000 records that had previously been released in redacted form and determined that more than 70 percent of those records may now be released in full.  This significant disclosure reflects my Administration’s commitment to transparency and will provide the American public with greater insight and understanding of the Government’s investigation into this tragic event in American history. 

          (c)  In the course of their review, agencies have identified a limited number of records containing information for continued postponement of public disclosure.  NARA has reviewed these proposed redactions and has coordinated with relevant consulting agencies, where appropriate, to ensure that the proposed redactions meet the statutory standard for continued postponement.  The Acting Archivist has recommended certifying a small subset of the reviewed records for continued postponement of public disclosure. 

          (d)  The Acting Archivist has further indicated that additional work remains to be done with respect to a limited number of other reviewed records that were the subject of agency proposals for continued postponement of public disclosure.  The Acting Archivist believes such additional work could further reduce the amount of redacted information.  The Acting Archivist therefore recommends that I temporarily certify the continued postponement of public disclosure of the redacted information in these records to provide additional time for review and to ensure that information from these records is disclosed to the maximum extent possible, consistent with the standards of the Act.

Sec. 3.  Certification.  In light of the proposals from agencies for continued postponement of public disclosure of information in the records identified in section 2(c) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, and the Acting Archivist’s recommendation, I agree that continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is warranted to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, I hereby certify that continued postponement of public disclosure of these records is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  All information within these records that agencies have proposed for continued postponement under section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act shall accordingly be withheld from public disclosure.  Further release of the information in these records shall occur in a manner consistent with the Transparency Plans described in section 7 of this memorandum.  

Sec. 4.  Temporary Certification.  In light of the proposals from agencies for continued postponement of public disclosure of information in the records identified in section 2(d) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, the Acting Archivist’s request for an extension of time to continue review of those records, and the need for an appropriately thorough review process, I agree with the Acting Archivist’s recommendation regarding temporary postponement.  Temporary continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act,...

...I hereby certify that all information within these records that agencies have proposed for continued postponement under section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act shall be withheld from public disclosure until June 30, 2023.

Sec. 5.  Release.  Any information currently withheld from public disclosure that agencies have not proposed for continued postponement shall be released to the public by December 15, 2022.

Sec. 6.  Review.  (a)  From the date of this memorandum until May 1, 2023, relevant agencies and NARA shall jointly review the remaining redactions in the records addressed in sections 2(d) and 4 of this memorandum with a view to maximizing transparency and disclosing all information in records concerning the assassination, except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.  Any information that agencies propose for continued postponement of public release beyond June 30, 2023, shall be limited to the absolute minimum under the statutory standard.  Agencies shall not propose to continue redacting information unless the redaction is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  In applying the statutory standard, agencies shall:

               (i)   accord substantial weight to the public interest in transparency and full disclosure of any record that falls within the scope of the Act; and

               (ii)  give due consideration that some degree of harm is not grounds for continued postponement unless the degree of harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

          (b)  If, by no later than May 1, 2023, NARA agrees that a proposed redaction meets the statutory standard for continued postponement, the Archivist shall recommend to the President, no later than May 1, 2023, that continued postponement of public disclosure of the information is warranted after June 30, 2023.

          (c)  If, by no later than May 1, 2023, NARA does not recommend that a proposed redaction meets the statutory standard for continued postponement, agencies shall, no later than May 15, 2023:

               (i)   withdraw the proposed redaction; or

               (ii)  recommend to the President, through the Counsel to the President, on a document-by-document basis, that release of the information continue to be postponed, providing an explanation for each proposed redaction of why continued postponement remains necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

          (d)  In the development of the recommendations described in this section, as questions arise about particular proposed redactions, NARA shall consult, as appropriate, with relevant agencies as described in section 5(d) of my 2021 Memorandum.

          (e)  At the conclusion of the review described in this section, any information withheld from public disclosure that agencies do not propose for continued postponement beyond June 30, 2023, shall be released to the public by that date.

Sec. 7.  Transparency Plans.  As part of their review, each agency prepared a plan for the eventual release of information (Transparency Plan) to ensure that information would continue to be disclosed over time as the identified harm associated with release of the information dissipates.  Each Transparency Plan details the event-based or circumstance-based conditions that will trigger the public disclosure of currently postponed information by the National Declassification Center (NDC) at NARA.  These Transparency Plans have been reviewed by NARA, and the Acting Archivist has advised that use of the Transparency Plans by the NDC will ensure appropriate continued release of information covered by the Act.  Accordingly, I direct that the Transparency Plans submitted by agencies be used by the NDC to conduct future reviews of any information that has been postponed from public disclosure, including information in the records described in sections 2(c) and 3 of this memorandum.   

Sec. 8.  Publication.  The Acting Archivist is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

                               JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

Monday, December 5, 2022

December6 Press Conference at National Press Club DC


National Press Club Event

MEDIA ADVISORY
Press Conference,
National Press Club, Washington DC
Tuesday, December 6 at 9:30 am EST

SMOKING GUN IN THE JFK FILES?

Featured NationalPressClubEvent

https://youtu.be/To5UEvb5jQU


What Has the Government Been Hiding for Nearly 60 Years?

With President Biden’s December 15 deadline for full JFK disclosure approaching, the non-profit Mary Ferrell Foundation (MFF), sponsor of the internet’s largest collection of searchable JFK documents, will present evidence of a potential major break in the JFK assassination story.

Biden set next week’s deadline in an October 2021 memo calling on all federal agencies to release their remaining documents related to the November 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which will be made public by the National Archives in College Park, Maryland.

"We have been peeling layers off the onion that is the murder of a U.S. president at the height of the Cold War, year by year," says MFF president Rex Bradford. "Our work remains unfinished." In October 2022, the MFF sued President Biden and the National Archives for failure to implement the JFK Records Act of 1992.

"Astonishingly, the CIA continues to conceal its 'sources and methods' around the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald," says MFF vice president Jefferson Morley. "But we now know where the rest of the Oswald story is hidden: in JFK files the CIA has redacted or denied in full."

"These records relate to a still-classified covert operation, approved by senior Agency officials in June 1963, that used Oswald for intelligence purposes," Morley went on. "Is the undisclosed operational interest in the accused assassin evidence of CIA incompetence? Or CIA complicity? We can’t be sure. Only full disclosure on December 15th will resolve the issue."

Former CIA officer Rolf Mowatt-Larssen will comment on the new and hidden evidence in JFK’s assassination.

Lawrence Schnapf will discuss recent outreach to the president and Congress to release the remaining redacted records in the JFK Collection, tell what has been learned about the Trump postponements, and review the basis for the MFF lawsuit.

Hon. Judge John Tunheim, former chair of the Assassination Records Review Board, will talk about the review board’s work and the status of the JFK Records Act.

Fernand Amandi, pollster, will present the results of a nationwide poll, detailing what the American public thinks about the causes of JFK's assassination and what President Biden should do about the remaining secret JFK files.

CONTACT

LIVESTREAM ON YOUTUBE: DEC. 6, 2022, 9:30 am-11:00am ET
Please sign on 15 minutes early.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To5UEvb5jQU

For interviews about the new JFK disclosures, call Jefferson Morley, vice president Mary Ferrell Foundation: 202 413 7841 or DM @jeffersonmorley.

For interviews about Mary Ferrell Foundation’s lawsuit seeking JFK files, call attorney Larry Schnapf 212-876-3189 or email Larry@Schnapflaw.com

Click for more information on the JFK records lawsuit.

SPEAKERS

Rex Bradford is president of the non-profit Mary Ferrell Foundation and creator of the foundation's web site ( maryferrell.org), which hosts the internet’s largest collection of searchable JFK assassination records, along with documents collections about the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King.

Lawrence P. Schnapf is a New York City lawyer and an adjunct professor at New York Law School. Schnapf is co-counsel with Bill Simpich in the lawsuit Mary Ferrell Foundation filed to enforce the JFK Records Act.

Hon. John R. Tunheim serves as a federal judge in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. From 1994 to 1998, Tunheim served as chair of the Assassination Records Review Board. He and four fellow board members presided over the review and release of four million pages of JFK assassination records, most of which had never been made public before.

Fernand Amandi is president and CEO of Bendixen-Amandi International, a Miami based communications firm. He manages corporate operations, including multicultural public opinion polls, focus groups, media production and strategic communications and research management. He is a guest lecturer in political science at the University of Miami and political analyst for MSNBC.

Jefferson Morley is vice president of the Mary Ferrell Foundation and the editor of the JFK Facts blog (jfkfacts.substack.com). A former editor and reporter at the Washington Post, he is the author of three books on the CIA in the 1960s, Our Man in Mexico, The Ghost, and Scorpions' Dance.

(Remote) Rolf Mowatt-Larssen is the William J. Perry Distinguished Fellow at Nuclear Threat Initiative, supporting NTI's work on global threat reduction. Previously, he spent 23 years as a CIA operations officer in various domestic and international posts, including Chief of the Europe Division in the Directorate of Operations, Chief of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Department, Counterterrorist Center, and Deputy Associate Director of Central Intelligence for Military Support. He has also lectured on the causes of JFK's assassination.

Moderator: Lawrence Schnapf is an Adjunct Professor of Law at New York Law school.

   Some background material

 https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/11/22/jfk-what-the-cia-hides/  {Morley)

  The assumption of Justice Breyer and many others is that any and all unseen CIA material must exonerate the agency. It’s an odd conclusion. If the CIA has nothing to hide, why is it hiding so much? While 95 percent of the still-secret files probably are trivial, the remaining 5 percent—thousands of pages of material–are historically pregnant.  If made public, they could clarify key questions in the long-running controversy about JFK’s death.

  These questions have been raised most concisely by Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, a career CIA officer who served in senior positions. Now a senior fellow at Harvard’s Belfer Center, Mowatt-Larssen has implicated his former employer in the Dallas ambush. In a presentation at Harvard last December, Mowatt-Larssen hypothesized that a plot to kill JFK emanated from the CIA’s station in Miami where disgruntled Cuban exiles and undercover officers loathed JFK for his failure to overthrow Castro’s government in Cuba.

  Mowatt-Larssen has yet to publish his presentation and documentation, so I can’t say if he’s right or wrong. But he asks the right question: “How can intelligence operational and analytical modus operandi help unlock a conspiracy that has remained unsolved for 55 years?” And he focuses on the right place to dig deeper: the CIA’s Miami office, known as WAVE station.

  Yet legitimate questions persist: Did a plot to kill JFK originate in the agency’s Miami station as Mowatt-Larssen suggests? The fact that the CIA won’t share the evidence that could answer the CIA man’s question is telling.

  So these days, when people ask me who killed JFK, I say the Kennedy was probably victimized by enemies in his own government, possibly including CIA officers involved in anti-Castro and counterintelligence operations. I have no smoking gun, no theory. Just look at the suspicious fact pattern, still shrouded in official secrecy, and it’s easy to believe that JFK was, as Mowatt-Larssen puts it, “marked for assassination.”

     https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/31/jfk-revisited-oliver-stone-and-the-new-jfk-fact-pattern/  (Morley)

  After 30 years of reporting on the CIA’s role in the JFK story, I am not persuaded by the Agency’s O.J. Simpson defense. I see no proof beyond a reasonable doubt that any one CIA employee was guilty of plotting to kill Kennedy. But that does not mean CIA officers were innocent of malfeasance in the wrongful death of the president. To the contrary, I think, like LBJ and Castro, that the preponderance of evidence shows Kennedy was killed by enemies in his own government. These enemies cannot yet be identified because of the bizarre and suspicious secrecy that still surrounds the JFK files 58 years after the fact.

  The State of the Case

  Rest assured, I didn’t come by my views via the KGB or QAnon or even Oliver Stone. My thinking has been most influenced recently by Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, a retired CIA officer who teaches, ironically enough, at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. His espionage credentials are impressive. He playing a leading role in the counterintelligence investigation that snared Soviet spy Aldrich Ames. He ran operations deep in the sphere of Russian influence. As his memoir, State of Mind: Faith and CIA demonstrates, he is a creative thinker with a penetrating mind.

  In a compelling presentation to JFK researchers in Dallas in November 2019, Mowatt-Larssen made a cogent case that the gunfire in Dealey Plaza was the product of a tightly compartmentalized operation, mounted by Kennedy’s enemies in the ranks of the CIA that was probably known to only four or five people. Mowatt-Larssen’ interpretation strikes me as more convincing than the large conspiracy that Stone evokes in JFK the movie and implies in JFK Revisited.

While I cannot identify the leaders in such a conspiracy, if there was one, I can identify one participant, the late George Joannides. He was the Miami-based undercover officer whose agents generated propaganda about Oswald and Castro before and after JFK was killed. Fifteen years later, he was called out of retirement to stonewall the House Select Committee on Assassination, a performance that won him a CIA medal.

  His story was partially uncovered by my 16 year-long Freedom of Information lawsuit for Joannides’s files, as covered by the Associated Press and USA Today. But key documents remain out of public view, thanks to a split appellate court decision by Judge Brett Kavanaugh. In his last ruling before ascending to the Supreme Court in July 2018, Kavanaugh ruled that the CIA deserved “deference upon deference” when it came to JFK records. In their refusal to confront the new historical record of Kennedy’s assassination, our newspapers of records and Stone’s critics, display a Kavanaughian deference at the expense of their own credibility.

  To be sure, there is no evidence that Joannides (who died in 1991) was witting to a plot to kill Kennedy. There is abundant evidence that he was an accessory after the fact. Joannides did not conspire to kill the president. He blocked the investigation of those who probably did.

  I say “probably” because we don’t have all the evidence. The CIA continues to withhold 44 documents about Joannides’s secret operations, including an unexplained high-level security clearance in the summer of 1963 and a missing performance evaluation from September 1978 when he was stonewalling congressional investigators.

  The withholding of these ancient documents is not smoking gun proof of conspiracy but it is solid evidence that the CIA still has something significant to hide about JFK’s assassination. If and when Joannides’s personnel file and thousands of other still-secret CIA records become public, the question of a large vs small conspiracy–or no conspiracy at all–will be clarified. We won’t see those files until December 15, 2022 at the earliest.

  Until then, I can say Oliver Stone represented my views fairly and accurately, and none of his critics have disputed the analysis I shared with him and his audience. So, while there is much to be learned about the role of certain senior CIA officers in monitoring and manipulating Lee Harvey Oswald in 1963, JFK Revisited stands out as a journalistic service that the Washington Post and the New York Times have so far shirked.

     More:

     https://jfkfacts.org/cia-tradecraft-jfks-assassination-a-veteran-officer-analyzes-the-death-of-of-a-president/

     https://jfkfacts.org/cia-tradecraft-jfks-assassination-the-very-top-people/

     https://jfkfacts.org/cia-tradecraft-jfks-assassination-the-making-of-a-patsy/

     https://jfkfacts.org/cia-tradecraft-jfks-assassination-im-not-privy-to-who-struck-john/

     Jeff Meek on Mowatt-Larssen at CAPA, and more:

     https://www.swtimes.com/story/news/crime/2020/05/25/are-there-cia-connections-to-lee-oswald-part-1/113744782/

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx