In Rolling Stone's “review” of Oliver Stone’s JFK Revisited – Through The Looking Glass, Tim Weiner says: “This Is Where Oliver Stone Got His Loony JFK Conspiracies From.”
This is where Tim Weiner gets his
disinformation wrong.
By William E. Kelly, Jr.
At one time Rolling Stone magazine
was the voice of a generation, and published the ground breaking article by
Carl Bernstein on The CIA and the Media, which began to unravel the CIA’s
Mockingbird Operation that utilized the media for its own propaganda purposes.
[ http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php / https://jfkcountercoup2.blogspot.com/2021/11/carl-bernsteins-rolling-stone-article.html ]
As Walt Kelly once said, “We have met the enemy and he is us,” and indeed, with this article by Tim Weiner, Rolling Stone officially joins the opposition, the opposition to the truth.
Weiner asks us, “Do you believe that
the CIA killed JFK? Millions of Americans suspect so. Let me ask you,
then: Why do they believe it?”
Then he gives the wrong answer: “The
tale can be traced to a Russian disinformation operation.”
No it
can be traced to the fact that the evidence in the case provided by the Warren
Commission itself proves Oswald wasn’t even on the sixth floor at the time of
the shooting and was not responsible for the assassination. But Weiner, who
must be well read on intelligence matters, since he won a Pulitzer Prize for
the Philadelphia Inquirer for exposing Pentagon waste, blames it on the
Ruskies, and he knows better. His history of the CIA "Legacy of Ashes," could not have been written without their help. He is just propagating the false and what the CIA
calls an “active measure” to blame the communists for the assassination, a key
aspect of the original plan to kill Fidel Castro that was re-directed to JFK at
Dealey Plaza.
As
Weiner writes: “But what you believe about it boils
down to this: Either Lee Harvey Oswald, trained by the United States Marines as
a sharpshooter before he defected to the Soviet Union, got off a million-to-one
shot in Dallas. He acted alone. Or he was an instrument of a conspiracy so
immense that it staggers the mind.”
No, it was not so immense at all,
but a well developed, trained and practiced plan, out of JMWAVE and carried out
by a small team of assassins, a covert intelligence operation designed to
deceive, and Weiner and those who promote his fallacies have been deceived, as
they try to tell us we were deceived by the Russians.
Weiner tells us: “Like the cold-war
CIA, the KGB paid editors and reporters around the world to print stories that
could advance the Kremlin’s international agendas. In the late 1950’s, it
created a directorate to undermine America. Department D — D as
in dezinformatsiya — aimed to bend and shape public opinion, and
above all to defame the United States. The Department of Disinformation was the
world’s first industrial factory of fake news.” This is something John Barron
has been telling us for decades, and Max Holland has been promoting for years.
But the Ruskies were certainly not
the first, as the Vatican had their own Propaganda Department assigned to
propagate the faith, and by World War II, propaganda had been developed into a
fine art, as exhibited by US Army officer Paul Linebarger, who wrote the military
textbook on Propaganda, and later taught CIA officers the basis for Black
Propaganda and covert operational procedures as a John Hopkins professor of the
School for International Studies.
Among Linebarger’s students were
David Atlee Phillips, along with E. Howard Hunt and Ed Lansdale, who Linebarger
said “had black minds,” and Joseph Smith, who described some of Linebarger’s
lectures in detail in his book Portrait
of a Cold Warrior.
Black Propaganda, as opposed to
White, Grey or other shades of color, was a very specific type of propagada
that “is carefully labeled to be acts of the enemy.”
And Weiner’s article is itself Black
Propaganda.
Weiner tells us: “I’ve spent half my
life reporting, writing, and reading about the CIA and American intelligence. I
remember the Kennedy assassination; I’ve studied the evidence. And I can’t tell
you that there wasn’t a conspiracy. Maybe it was the Russians. Could
have been the Cubans. Might have been the Mafia. Maybe there’s a mind-blowing
bombshell in the still-classified archives of the government. But I seriously
doubt it.”
Maybe the Russians, Cubans or Mafia?
Everybody but those actually responsible.
As Weiner
says, “We have a moral obligation to call bullshit when we see it.”
And I’m
calling that Bullshit. The assassination was a domestic covert intelligence
operation conducted by a domestic intelligence agency, an action approved by
the highest levels of the US government, or they would not have gotten away
with it.
As for
Garrison’s investigation being sparked by an article in Paese Sera, an Italian publication at the instigation of the KGB. Well I asked that question to the late Bill
Turner, who worked closely with Garrison, and he said the Paese Sera article
had no effect on Garrison at all. Garrison investigated the associations of the
accused assassin with those New Orleans characters – Shaw, Banister, Ferrie,
Novel, Smith, all within his jurisdiction.
It is
Tim Weiner himself who is promoting false disinformation and his own background
exposes it, especially his association with the Columbia Graduate School of
Journalism, which used to promote the Catherwood-Columbia Award, until the
Catherwood Foundation was exposed (By Wise and Ross in The Invisible Government) as a CIA front and bursar for covert
operational funds. That was replaced by the Lucas Award, once granted to Max
Holland, whose own article on this subject was published by CIA’s own inhouse
journal.
One
thing that struck me as I read through the Warren Commission’s volumes of
supporting documents were the numbers of CIA connected people who were
promoting the idea that Fidel Castro was behind the assassination – a still
active CIA psychological warfare campaign continued today by their media assets
– Gus Russo, Brian Latell, Bob Baer, Phil Shenon and now Tim Weiner.
HSCA
investigator Dan Hardway noticed the same thing, and when he got to question
David A. Phillips he asked him why a dozen of his associates and contacts were
promoting the Castro Cuban Commie story, and Phillips acknowledged knowing all
of those mentioned by Hardway but couldn’t explain it.
While
Bernstein names dozens of news and media networks that cooperated with the CIA,
I will only go into one – The Scripps Howard News Service (SHNS), whose Dallas
correspondent Seth Kantor, ran into his pal Jack Ruby at Parkland Hospital
shortly after the assassination. When he decided to write a book about Ruby he
couldn’t understand why his phone calls from Parkland were censored by the
government and sued them, only to find out that one of his calls was to a
fellow SHNS reporter in Florida, Hal Hendrix, who fed him all kinds of deep background on Lee
Harvey Oswald, the then recently arrested suspect. Hendrix was friends with
David A. Phillips, and knew him a “Maurice Bishop,” and was himself known by
other journalists as “The Spook” for writing about a Caribbean Coup a day
before it actually took place.
Then
there’s the SHNS story from 1980 that was based on a National Security Agency
(NSA) document “leaked” to them – that said Fidel Castro was planning to kill
President Reagan just as he had JFK killed, citing a Cuban radio broadcast as
the source. A few weeks later John Hinckley shot President Reagan with a pistol
purchased near Dealey Plaza, while his brother met with the son of Vice
President Bush in the White House. For
those who are interested, I include this entire document in one of the articles
liked below.
Disinformation
is strictly defined as false information deliberately promoted by a government
intelligence agency in order to support a covert intelligence operation. If it
isn’t that it is merely misinformation. And there’s plenty of disinformation
being thrashed about but it isn’t from the Russians, it’s that the Castro Cuban
Commies were behind the Dealey Plaza Operation, and it’s promoted by our own
CIA.
And Jim
Garrison and Oliver Stone didn’t fall for the Russian KGB disinformation, it is
Tim Weiner and Rolling Stone who are being manipulated into promoting such trash
that is part of the “avalanche of disinformation” Weiner writes about.
Nowhere
in Weiner’s article is any reference or refutation of the dozens of points made
in Stone’s documentary that exonerates Oswald as the assassin. Not a one.
I have
written extensively about Disinformation at Dealey Plaza over the years and
will try not to repeat myself, so I will provide links to the other articles.
https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2015/06/disinformation-at-dealey-plazq.html?m=1
https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2015/04/list-of-psychwar-black-prop-ops.html
https://aarclibrary.org/was-khruschev-behind-the-assassination-of-jfk-by-bill-kelly-5-march-2021/
https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2015/03/phillip-shenons-cruel-and-shocking-act.html
https://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/free/lobster74/lob74-phil-shenon-jfk.pdf
https://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2019/03/phil-shenon-rides-again-promoting.html
3 comments:
1st, why is one asked to sign in after writing a post & then not remembering pw u lose what you wrote. What am I missing. At any rate, obviously Weiner says to believe in conspiracy is by definition an exercise in paranoia. On the other hand he blames the Soviets or Cubans. Were they lone Soviet or Cuban gunman in Weiner’s view? It’s old news to hear the MSM’s acceptance of talk of conspiracy as long as it is engaged in by communists. Do they really not see the contradiction in their view? It is more likely they think the average person doesn’t see their obfuscation.
Hey Bill - thanks for this post, I have not yet read the RS article, but have seen Stone's documentary.
Interestingly, in the last two days, I've watched two other discussions on youtube:
1- featuring Dana Priest, Mara Hvistendahl, and... Tim Weiner, hosted by Tim Naftali, NYU professor of history and public service and CNN contributor titled: "Intelligence and Espionage: What’s Next?" Weiner has most recently written "The Folly and the Glory: America, Russia, and Political Warfare 1945-2000." (have not read). I thought, gee, I wonder what Weiner, with all this research and backround on the CIA thinks about the JFK assassination. Geez. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp9Oi28YPcs
2- on 11/23/2021, Thomm Hartmann and Lamar Waldron talk for nearly 2 hours titled: "The Conspiracy To Kill Kennedy Finally Exposed." Since I had not read their 3 books, I found it interesting, but I commented on it and went back to this site to find your reviews of Waldron's work. What was interesting about this talk is they do name some sources: Dean Rusk (for 12/1/63 coup invasion secret plan), John E. Nolan Jr. (who recently passed away at 90 years old), key aid to RFK, and Enrique (Harry) Ruiz, key Cuban and friend of RFK, and did name Juan Almeida (Bosque) as the key military aid leading asserted planned coup.
They also discredit Stone's work - specifically the 1992 film but completely ignore his documentary and they claim (using Walton interview) that RFK directed the botched autopsy as means of cover up to prevent WWIII. During the talk, they both even say "I guess we are also part of the cover up." I guess they are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4GEHn3HeI8
In reply to JYL's bottom line: understand that you cannot blame the many men and women who participated in the cover up. Take the memebers of the Warren Commission. They were not "in on it" (not referring to Dulles, the CEO of the murder), but Ford and Specter etc. They were told, yes, we know there were multiple shooters and we have to make it look like a lone nut to prevent WW3 and keep the people calm. I see these people as heroes. Yes, it's wrong to hide the truth, but it was well-intentioned.
Post a Comment