Thursday, March 14, 2013

Petitioning Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings to Open DP



                                                            Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings

Petitioning Mayor Mike Rawlings, Dallas, TX: Open Dealey Plaza to the public on November 22, 2013


and fill in the form. Please help us send this message to the Mayor.


Hello!
I've started the petition "Mayor Mike Rawlings, Dallas, TX: Open Dealey Plaza to the public on November 22, 2013" and need your help to get it off the ground.

Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link:


Here's why it's important:

For the last 49 years the critics of the Warren Commission and the official version of a lone gunman killing President Kennedy have gathered for a Moment of Silence on the Grassy Knoll in Dealey Plaza every November 22 at 12:30 pm to commemorate the moment of JFK's death and to speak truth to power, calling for a real investigation into his unsolved homicide, a full release of still classified records relating to the case, and a resolution for the purpose of both justice and history. Dealey Plaza is a designated National Historical site and as such belongs to the American people, the world and history, especially on November 22 at that hour. The Mayor of Dallas and his planning committee for "The 50th" want to close Dealey Plaza to the public and admit Dallas residents for an event that celebrates the life and legacy of President Kennedy and improves the image of Dallas, long seen as the "City of Hate" after the assassination, all without mentioning his murder or calling for the truth. His planned moment of silence will then become a perpetuity ofr silence. He wants to capture the national and international press attention that he knows will be there that day for an event that tries to freeze time at 12:29 pm on November 22, 1963, when Nellie Connally, the Texas Governor's wife, turns to President Kennedy in the motorcade limousine and says, "Well, Jack, you can't say Dallas doesn't love you". We all would like to stop history at that moment, but President Kennedy got a different message in the next 60 seconds. We also celebrate the life and legacy of John F. Kennedy, we just think it got him killed. You wouldn't celebrate the life and legacy of Abraham Lincoln on April 14 at the Ford Theater in Washington, DC. The stated purpose of the Mayor and the Sixth Floor Museum is to prevent "conspiracy theory" on the Knoll that day, which is content-based denial of free speech, a violation of First Amendment rights. We are in negotiation with the Mayor to allow our annual event to take place and do not wish to prevent his or other events that day at other times. This petition is meant to show public support for our free speech rights and for opening Dealey Plaza to the thousands of people who will be there that day from around the world.

You can sign my petition 


Thanks!
John Judge

Petitioning Mayor Mike Rawlings, Dallas, TX:
Open Dealey Plaza to the public on November 22, 2013

Petition by
Coalition on Political Assassinations

For the last 49 years the critics of the Warren Commission and the official version of a lone gunman killing President Kennedy have gathered for a Moment of Silence on the Grassy Knoll in Dealey Plaza every November 22 at 12:30 pm to commemorate the moment of JFK’s death and to speak truth to power, calling for a real investigation into his unsolved homicide, a full release of still classified records relating to the case, and a resolution for the purpose of both justice and history. Dealey Plaza is a designated National Historical site and as such belongs to the American people, the world and history, especially on November 22 at that hour.

The Mayor of Dallas and his planning committee for “The 50th” want to close Dealey Plaza to the public and admit Dallas residents for an event that celebrates the life and legacy of President Kennedy and improves the image of Dallas, long seen as the “City of Hate” after the assassination, all without mentioning his murder or calling for the truth.

His planned moment of silence will then become a perpetuity of silence. He wants to capture the national and international press attention that he knows will be there that day for an event that tries to freeze time at 12:29 pm on November 22, 1963, when Nellie Connally, the Texas Governor’s wife, turns to President Kennedy in the motorcade limousine and says, “Well, Jack, you can’t say Dallas doesn’t love you”. We all would like to stop history at that moment, but President Kennedy got a different message in the next 60 seconds. We also celebrate the life and legacy of John F. Kennedy, we just think it got him killed. You wouldn’t celebrate the life and legacy of Abraham Lincoln on April 14 at the Ford Theater in Washington, DC.

The stated purpose of the Mayor and the Sixth Floor Museum is to prevent “conspiracy theory” on the Knoll that day, which is content-based denial of free speech, a violation of First Amendment rights. We are in negotiation with the Mayor to allow our annual event to take place and do not wish to prevent his or other events that day at other times. This petition is meant to show public support for our free speech rights and for opening Dealey Plaza to the thousands of people who will be there that day from around the world.

To:
Mayor Mike Rawlings, Dallas, TX
Open Dealey Plaza to the public on November 22, 2013
Sincerely,
[Your name]

This email is being responded to on my iPad, so it bears the gmail address. Please respond to the address you sent it to below

John Judge
PO Box 7147
Washington, DC 20044
johnjudge@starpower.net
copa@starpower.net
citizenswatch@starpower.net
www.museumofhiddenhistory.org
www.judgeforyourself.org
www.politicalassassinations.com
www.groundsforimpeachment.com

Monday, March 11, 2013

JFK Assassination & Sunshine Week 2013


Sunshine Week 2013

Sunshine Week – March 10 -16, is dedicated to bringing the issues of Secrecy and Open Government before the American people and the government, and every year since it began in 2002 I have tried to include and emphasize the still classified records on the assassination of President Kennedy, with little success.

As explained at the web sit http://sunshineweek.rcfp.org/, “The Florida Society of Newspaper Editors launched Sunshine Sunday in 2002, and in June 2003, the American Society of Newspaper Editors hosted a Freedom of Information Summit in Washington where the seeds for Sunshine Week were planted. With a grant from John S. and James L. Knight Foundation,…Sunshine Week was launched in March 2005. This non-partisan, non-profit initiative…is about the public’s right to know what its government is doing, and why.”

Although the assassination of President Kennedy is an issue of high public interest, those journalists, historians and civil activists who have taken up the open records cause generally greet the mention of the secret records on the Kennedy assassination with moans and protests, consigning it in the same dump as UFOs and other amusing issues.

Actually the legally unresolved and unsolved homicide of the President, as Jim Hougan has pointed out, is an issue of national security of the first order – there is no other matter more significant than the murder of the president – it is the key political and historical issue of our time.

While the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has been rightly touted at previous Sunshine Week forums, this year is the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy and the 20th anniversary of the JFK Act of 1992, which has released more records (4 million) than any other single law, yet it remains unenforced.

Since the temporary Assassinations Records Review Board (ARRB) dissolved, their recommendations have gone unheeded, [http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2012/12/implimenting-arrb-recommendations.html]
especially the one requesting that the historical and archival associations that recommended them continue to conduct oversight of the law. Officially responsible for oversight of the law it unanimously created, Congress has failed to hold any oversight hearings on the JFK Act in over 15 years and has no intention to do so. [http://jfkcountercoup2.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-last-congressional-hearing-on-jfk.html]


As explained by James Douglas, author of “JFK and the Unthinkable,” [http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/Unspeakable/COPA2009.html]
Congress will not act again until the same forces that convinced them to create the law in the first place is marshaled once again as a mass movement to push for Congressional action, an unlikely occurrence, unless Oliver Stone and other similar celebrities get involved.

This year however, being the 50th anniversary of the assassination, we can redirect the conversation from debate over the Single Bullet Theory, the Zapruder film and other mineuta, to the issue of the official government JFK Assassination records, and why many of them were deliberately destroyed, are now missing and are being wrongfully withheld from the public because of national security.

Not a few records – many important military and Secret Service files have been destroyed rather than revealed publicly, some are missing – including the original Air Force One radio recordings, and many thousands of records – hundreds of thousands of pages of documents are still classified and could be withheld for ever, at least for our lifetime.

If the president was killed by a deranged lone nut, why are so many records considered so significant? Why were they destroyed? Who destroyed them? Who ordered their destruction? Where are the Air Force One tapes? Why can’t they find them? Why are so many documents classified for reasons of national security? Why doesn’t Congress oversee the law? Why don’t they hold public hearings on these issues and get answers to these questions?  

Why don’t you care enough about it to ask them?

Sign the petition: http://www.change.org/petitions/free-the-jfk-files?utm and pass it on to others you know. Write a letter to your Congressman, especially if they are on the House Oversight Committee  http://oversight.house.gov/committee-members/  and ask them why they don’t hold public oversight hearings of the JFK Act?  Then email it, post it on their Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Oversight as well as your Congressman’s  page, fax it to their home and DC offices and then email it by US Mail with a request for a response. 

Join our Facebook Focus Group Release JFK Assassination Records Now!

Friday, March 8, 2013

Grey and Relevant ? By G.W. Blakey


                                                        Professor G. Robert Blakey

                                        The Kennedy Assassination - Grey and Relevant?

Professor G. Robert Blakey, the second chief counsel to the HSCA, occasionally contributes to Paul Hoch’s private internet email group, and recently posted the following comments, which he has agreed to allow me to repost here.

Thanks to Paul Hoch for his many contributions to the case and John Simpkin for calling attention to this.

G. Robert Blakey : Biography

Professor Blakey:

(1)   I went down to the HSCA believing in the single assassin theory, because I knew WC staff members, not because I mastered the evidence in 1964. In fact, I got a cc of the paperback version of the Report and read it at the time, but not critically. Nor did I keep up with what the critics said about the report or the assassination itself.  E.G., I did not know who Mark Lane was or read his book until I was on the job. After I got to Washington, I changed my mind in light of the evidence, not solely because of neutron etc or acoustics, ALL of the evidence, including what the FBI and the CIA willfully withheld from the WC and the character of its investigation; had a conspiracy existed, what the WC did would not have uncovered it.

(2) We relied on the neutron, etc. in '79 as part of our independently establishing the single b. theory.  The FBI (and the rest of the forensic community) no longer accept it.  That does not mean the single b. theory is mistaken, only that the quantum of available evidence to establish it is less than it was in '79.

(3) People can (and do) reject our acoustics analysis.  [Unexplained for me, at least, is how it and the other evidence (testimony, photos, X-rays, etc.) fit hand-in-glove with the timing and direction of the three shots (excluding the shot from the fence for a moment).  Chance event? Not likely. And if you look at the shot from fence, you find creditable witnesses establishing it (Landis, Holland, Bill and Gale Newman, etc)  It is easier to find the three from the TSDB, but showing three from it, does not disprove another from the fence.]

      The WC said only three shots, because it found only three shells in the TSDB [and because if it said at least three, leaving open that more might have occurred, it could not creditably say single shooter.]

      It decided that the witnesses who heard more than three or from two directions were wrong because it did not have corroboration for them [and because if it said more or different directions, etc]

      I know of no principle in law (or anywhere else) that says that eye or ear witness evidence MUST be corroborated before a fact-finder can use it to decide a question of fact in law (or anything else).

      Single shooter was one theory, but hardly the only one.

      The WC was a political body, not a scientific or even historical commission. The single shooter was a political judgment.

 It is not NECESSARILY what happened.

(4)  Why most people think conspiracy is complex.  Max (Holland) oversimplifies it; his mind sees matters as black or while.  No grey.  JFK was an important person. LHO was nobody.  It is not fitting that one so small should bring down one so large. Other sinister forces must be at work. That is a gut matter, not a question of reason. The evidence is complex, difficult to put together, and it points in more than one direction, particularly if you are troubled by what happened in the Plaza. 

No one who first see the Z film, when he sees JFK's head snap back, can not think he was hit only from behind. I find it easy now to see how most of the world thinks it was a
conspiracy ... but when most of them are questioned, the reasons they offer to support their thesis melt away.

(5) Putting grand theories about history to one side, and looking at ALL of the evidence, and FAIRLY evaluating it, reasonable people can conclude that LHO did it alone. On the other hand, reasonable people can also come out the other way; it is not black or white; it is grey.

      The major problem with this blog is that too often people do not credit others with good faith, competency, or even sanity.

(6) I don't know about the rest of your, but I live in a grey world.  I wish it were black or white, one way or the other; it would be easier to live.

      God or no God.  If God, religion? If religion, which one?  Take your pick for the large list, now or from the past. How shall we run the economy? For some or for all?  How shall we run the government?  One guy in charge? Many? A few? A mixed government?  Etc.

     The Greeks went through most of these questions during their Enlightenment.  We only go through variations of the same arguments over and again. 

True, the modern world has given us empirical science, but it can only tells us "how" the world works and give us a temporary theory of "how."

It says nothing about "who" or "why," because the answers to those questions are not empirical, as a matter of the theory of empirical science. When prominent scientist talk about these issue, they are "out of order." They have not qualified themselves as scientists to make such statements.  Why does something exist? Or nothing? Or for what purpose? Or no purpose at all. For science, no theory is final.  And because it deal in "facts" not "values," whatever they are, it can not give us a standard by which we OUGHT to chose.

      l live in a grey world, generally, and on what happened, as a matter of fact, in Dallas 50 years ago, and why, if that question is even relevant.





G Robert Blakey wrote:

Down deep in your observations is a question that admits of a factual answer.
At the end of his deposition, I talked with Rankin off the record on "personal" matters.  He "ran" the WC.  I had to "run" the HSCA I asked him if he could give me any advice based on his experience with his staff.  He told me that I had to get the staff to stop  arguing and put its thoughts on paper.  Until it wrote, we could make no progress.  I found his advice sage.

During the investigation, the staff drafted sections of the report that dealt with JFK and MLK, depending on their expertise. The committee itself never reviewed these staff drafts. The staff drafts were merely one way of focusing the mind. Where major issues developed, we had two drafts to see how each withstood analysis.  In fact, the vast majority of areas in both cases did not produce two drafts.  If anything, the staff was prone to finding evidence of conspiracy in more than one area.

When we had a "final" draft, the committee voted on it, and where individuals disagreed they wrote concurring or dissenting opinions. The various staff drafts were written knowing full well we did not have the tape evidence. When it came the staff integrated it into the drafts. The committee did not get a final draft until all of the evidence was in. No draft was final until it went through me, Stokes, Devine AND the rest of the committee.

It is a myth, that is, a supposed truth that supports a theory not rooted in fact, that the tape evidence turned around anything.

Michael, does that answer your question?



Sunday, March 3, 2013

RFK and Operation 3111


Operation 3111 Analysis

A memo approving CIA covert operation 3111 is one of the JFK assassination related documents among the records of Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy that was sought by Max Holland and mentioned in his February 2012 FOIA suit filed with the NARA.

Holland withdrew the suit once it was clear that all the records being sought were released.

We get the document thanks to Max Holland’s persistence, but it comes with his spin on it.

On 28 February 2013, under the title of RFK OK’d Sabotage Against Cuba in November 1963 Holland distributed the document and wrote:

“Ever since the Church Committee’s investigation of the intelligence community in the mid-1970s — if not earlier — it has been well known that Robert F. Kennedy was deeply involved in the Kennedy administration’s efforts to subvert and overthrow the regime of Fidel Castro. RFK regularly attended meetings of the so-called Special Group of the National Security Council, which directed and coordinated US policy toward Cuba, including most covert operations. And as Harris Wofford observed in his 1980 book, Of Kennedys and Kings within the Special Group the attorney general was the driving force behind the clandestine effort to overthrow Castro. From inside accounts of the pressure he was putting on the CIA to ‘get Castro,’ he seemed like a wild man who was out-CIAing the CIA.”

“Still, extant records specifying RFK’s direct involvement are few and far between. One of seven documents released by the National Archives in response to a Judicial Watch lawsuit, however, is an EYES ONLY memo that reveals Robert F. Kennedy personally signed off on a sabotage operation against Cuba in November 1963.”


EYES ONLY
SECRET                                                   4 NOV 1963

4-13

FROM THE COORDINATOR OF CUBAN AFFAIRS

SUBJECT:  Prosposed Infiltration/Exfiltration Operation
                    For 8 November 1963

  1. The purpose of this memorandum is to present for your consideration and approval, the initial infiltration/exfiltration operation for the month of November 1963. Additional proposals for operations during the month of November 1963 will be presented at a later date.

  1. The proposed operation is as follows:

OPERATION: 3111

DATE : o/a/ 8 November 1963

PLACE/PURPOSE: A low-key sabotage operation against a warehouse and pier at Nazabal on the coast of Norther Las villas. This operation will be accomplished by a commando group landing on the pier and destroying the pier and warehouse with demolitions and Incendiaries. This operation, if successful, will reduce dockage and storage facilities as part of our continuing long-range program.

  1. It is required that approval be granted for the conduct of the operation outlined in paragraph 2 above.

Initial

Oval Seal: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Received NOV 4 1963


EYES ONLY
SECRT

Declassified under the provisions
Of the JFK Assassinations Records
Collection Act of 1962 (PL1DQ4161(?)
By_____NARA, Date 9/22/90


Indeed, there’s RFK’s oval seal and imprimatur that proves to me that RFK read the memo and approved the operation 3111, but that’s not the most interesting thing about this document.

For starters, Operation 3111 is most certainly one of the few – one a month – officially approved CIA operations that would be carried out by the CIA’s JMWAVE maritime unit in Florida, one that we know quite a lot about.

This makes me wonder if there is a relationship between this “Operation 3111” and the U2 “Mission 3111” of October 1962 – a year earlier, which detected Soviet missiles in Cuba.

Mission 3111 – a U2 flight over Cuba that took place on 18 October 1962, a year earlier – makes me wonder why the CIA would identify two different missions a year apart with the same tag number, unless there is a specific difference between a mission and an operation?

CIA Documents on the Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) By Mary S. McAuliffe see p. 263 and 281. 76. Lundahl, Memorandum for Director of Central Intelligence and Director, Defense Intelligence Agency, “Additional Information – Missions 3111 and 3113,” 21 October 1962  p. 263

The State Department had previously announced that US policy would forbid attacks against Cuba from US shores, and the FBI and other branches of government cracked down on the unauthorized raiders – though they did work with some  (ie. Pawley Operation Red Cross).

As detailed in The JFK Assassination – The Administrative Details, http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2012/04/jfk-coup-detat-administrative-details_27.html these missions date to a policy decision made at an April 1, 1963 meeting that approved a series of covert operations against Cuba, and should be viewed as a continuation of them.

Operation 3111 appears to be one of the approved missions, and its date – November 4 approval for a mission on November 8, four days later, must be reviewed in relation to the previous mission – the October 30-31 mission that resulted in an all out shoot out on the beach, the loss of an infiltration team and the cover blown of the mother ship Rex, a photo of which was published on the front page of the November 1, 1963 New York Times.


CASTRO SAYS C.I.A. USES RAIDER SHIP

He Asserts Cuba Captured Small Boats From Vessel – Miami Owner Denies It

By The Associated Press

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. Oct., 31 – Premier Fidel Castro charged last night that the Central Intelligence Agency was operating a raider ship called the Rex, and that she had been used in a sabotage mission against Cuba. He said two small boats from the Rex and several C.I.A. agents had been captures.

Premier Castro described the Rex as a 150-foot diesel vessel flying the Nicaraguan flag. He said she was based in West Palm Beach.

A vessel called the Rex, 174 feet long, returned to Palm Beach Monday and was tied up today in the Port of Palm Beach. She flies the Nicaraguan flag and carries large searchlights, radar and a crane on the stern. Two motor launches were missing from their davits.

The port director, Joel Wilcox, said, “The dockage is paid by the Sea Key Shipping Company from a post office box. I know nothing of the Rex’s activities. “

Oil Man Claims Ship

J.A. Belcer, a Miami oil company executive, told The Miami Herald that the Rex belonged to him, but denied hat it had participated in raids against Cuba.

He said he bought the vessel from the Paragon Company, identified by The Herald as a Nicaraguan firm formerly owned by the family of Luis Somoza, an ex-President of Nicaragua.

Mr. Belcher told The Herald that for most of the year he had leased the Rex for electronic and oceanographic research to the international division of the Collins Radio Company of Dallas. He said the ship’s captain, identified as Alexander Brooks, had told him the Rex had never been in Cuban waters.

Premier Castro, in a radio and television broadcast, said that the captured agents might face death sentences.

In his three-hour speech, the Premier accused the C.I.A. of “stepping up its activities against Cuba in the wake of the devastation caused by Hurricane Flora.”

He accused the Central Intelligence Agency of murdering workers, landing weapons and infiltrators in Cuba, hiring saboteurs and using postal packages to send explosives into Cuba.

“This was the kind of aid the United States sent to Cuba after the hurricane,” he said. “They thought they had their opportunity after the hurricane. This explains and justifies Cuba’s rejections of the United States offer to aid.”

There are two other mysterious vessels of Nicaraguan registry operating out of ports of Florida’s southeast coast. One sometimes changes color.

The Leda is tied up at Port Everglades and the Port of Fort Lauderdale, 45 miles south of Palm Beach. She is registered from Greytown, Nicaragua, which is now known as San Juan del Norte.

A Miami man who knew a crewman on the Villaro said today, “She was a funny ship. She changed colors all the time. Sometimes the hull would be blue with a green deck. Other times it was gray with an orange deck. My friend said she was working in oil exploration.

Coast Guard headquarters in Miami said it had no listing for any of the ships or their companies.

END NYT ARTICLE Nov. 1, 1963 p. 1

The Rex was also on a sabatoge mission according to William Turner (Rearview Mirror – Penmarin Books, CA. 2001, p. 185-186), when he wrote that it was “a sabotage attack on a shore installation in Pinar del Rio Province,” and a deposit a team of commando assassins infiltrators. “It was a CIA operation,” with an all Cuban crew, says Turner. He also reports, “When a mission was scheduled, they received a phone call, then a nondescript CIA van picked them up and took them to the West Palm Beach berth where the Rex was tied up. The dockage fees were paid by a CIA front, Sea Shipping Company, which operated out of a post office box.”

The Captain of the Rex, Alejandro Brooks, received his orders from Gordon Campbell, the director of the CIA’s naval operations. “The men belonged to the Commando Mambises,…the CIA’s elite, the Green Berets of the secret war. They were led by Major Manuel Villafana, a spit-and-polish officer who had commanded the Bay of Pigs air force. Villafana insisted that his men be paid low because he wanted them driven by hate, not money.”

According to Turner, “The Rex was not listed in Jane’s Fighting Ships. It was a World War II subchaser pulled out of the mothball fleet at Green Cove Springs, Florida. Painted a classy dark blue, the 174-foot vessel could cut through the waves at twenty knots. It flew the blue-and-white flag of Nicaragua, whose strongman, General Luis Somoza, had hosted the Bay of Pigs invasion brigade…”

“There were oversized searchlights, elaborate electronics gear that towered amidships, and a large crane on the aft deck capable of raising and lowering twenty-foot speed boats,” wrote Turner. “After the Rex put to sea, its guns were brought up from below decks and secured in their topside mounts: two 40-mm naval cannon, a 57-mm recoilless rifle, and two 20-mm cannon.”

Having interviewed some of the crewmembers, Turner got a full report on what happened. “The target on this mission was the giant Matahambre copper mine near Cape Corriente on the bootheel of Pinar del Rio Province…when the Rex arrived at the landing zone, there was a sense of foreboding: the Cape Corriente light, normally flashing a warning to maritime traffic, was dark….As the vessel came to a stop, two specially designed fiberglass speedboats, called Moppies, slid down the high-speed davits on the afterdeck…They were to link up with two commandos who had infiltrated a week earlier to reconnoiter the target. The answer came back in the wrong code; it was a trap.”

“The commandos fired at the riverbank,” only to be raked by return fire from heavy machine guns. One raft was torn apart by tracer bullets, spilling the dead and dying into the water…Then one of the Moppies was framed in the searchlights of a Russian built P-6 patrol craft: the Rex quartermaster piloting it surrendered….Brooks made a feint toward open sea, then doubled back and hugged the coastline…The move paid off. Minutes later, a pair of Cuban helicopters…dropped flares…..(illuminating)…the 32,500 ton J. Louis, …carrying a cargo of bauxite from Jamaica to Texas. Five Cuban MiGs began strafing….US Navy Phantom jets took off and headed for the scene. But just before arriving, the Phantoms were called back….” 

[BK Notes: After I wrote a blog post about the Rex mission, I received an email from the son of one of the mambasies who escaped in another moppie. He told me that the physician for the Rex Dr. Armando Cruz is still alive and practicing in Florida, SUNDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2012 Son from Moppie One]

Bill, 

My dad was on that second moppie you mentioned in your article.  They were picked up by the merchant ship and taken to Panama where they were in jail and questioned until the CIA intervened and got them out. I’d love to know more. I only know the stories my dad told me but would love to read any additional research you have on this…. They had casualties on board.  They didnt know what had happened to the other Moppie and the Rex had gone.  They later saw from afar the glow of the freighter being attacked.  They thought it was the Rex under fire.  He didnt mention their stopping the merchant ship by firing any weapons.  He said they signaled the ship and their story was that they had gone out to fish but had engine trouble.  Of course no one would believe them because their boat was all shot up.  But they werent allowed to talk and that was their story and they were sticking to it….  

Thank you.
Onan Cordova

Both the target of the Rex attack Pinar del Rio and the 3111 – Nazabal, are on the North Shore of Cuba within easy reach of Florida Keys.

The proposed target - pier and warehouse at Northern Las Villas

Here’s a video of Nazabal today, a quiet fishing village without much industry though it appears to have a train and trolley, and an extensive boat pier though few if any boats.

Nazabal today video showing pier, though there appears to be some ruined pier as well
NAZABAL 3 - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqLTZc6J-Mc
The 3111 operatioon to Nazabal, if it proceeded and completed, should have made the news like the Rex mission did, since you can’t blow up a pier and warehouse without attracting attention, but I haven’t found any evidence of this yet, and some of the sabotage missions that Brad Ayers planned and practiced for were often postponed or called off.

In any case, we know that RFK approved it, as did the Special Group and CCC, and we suspect that these Cuban missions out of JMWAVE are connected to the Dealey Plaza operation, as some of them are – Bayo-Pawley, Rex, Clare Booth Luce’s Julio Fernandez and possibly Operation 3111, if we can learn more about it.

As for RFK, concludes White (editor of the Cuban documents), “Robert Kennedy, such a conspicuous figure on the Cuban matters in 1961-62, was less prominent in 1963 in shaping administration policy towards Castro. But his role remained significant.”  

Witness reports place RFK at JMWAVE when William Harvey was there, as Harvey instigated an incident when RFK tried to read a classified cable and Harvey snatched it out of his hands saying he wasn’t cleared to read it. Later, RFK ostensibly flew in to the Everglades to meet with some of the commandos assigned to certain covert raids approved by the Special Group and the President, which included five raids in the summer and fall of 1963, which were presented in April and approved in early June, 1963.

On April Fools Day, 
April 1, 1963, the Cuban Coordinating Committee – Covert Operations in Cuba (CCC-COC) met, the subject of an April 3 memo from Gordon Chase of the National Security Council to McGeorge Bundy, the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs. It included a still classified agenda and matters discussed by the Cottrell Committee, which White identifies as “An interdepartmental committee, chaired by Sterling J. Cottrell, in early 1963 to coordinate the administration’s covert and overt Cuban policies.”

In summary, Gordon Chase notes, “In approving the three programs for Special Group considerations, the committee recognized that they will probably be of marginal value only: however, they will cost us very little, financial or otherwise.” Under agenda item number four, “Sabotage of Cuban Shipping – The Committee…will recommend to the Special Group the incendiaries which would be timed to go off in international waters and the abrasives in the machinery. While the propaganda boost might be nil, they are easier to effect than limpets and could really hurt Castro.”

Then Chase tells McBundy, “The Committee gave the CIA the option of using its own Cubans or of using DRE as a cut-out.”

The DRE are the anti-Castro Cuban Student Revolutionary Directorate, whose members interacted with Oswald before the assassination.

JFKcountercoup: DRE REPORT


Friday, March 1, 2013

CUBAN OPERATION 3111

OPERATION: 3111



SECRET                                                   4 NOV 1963

4-13

FROM THE COORDINATOR OF CUBAN AFFAIRS

SUBJECT:  Prosposed Infiltration/Exfiltration Operation
                    For 8 November 1963

  1. The purpose of this memorandum is to present for your consideration and approval, the initial infiltration/exfiltration operation for the month of November 1963. Additional proposals for operations during the month of November 1963 will be presented at a later date.

  1. The proposed operation is as follows:

OPERATION: 3111

DATE : o/a/ 8 November 1963

PLACE/PURPOSE: A low-key sabotage operation against a warehouse and pier at Nazabal on the coast of Norther Las villas. This operation will be accomplished by a commando group landing on the pier and destroying the pier and warehouse with demolitions and Incendiaries. This operation, if successful, will reduce dockage and storage facilities as part of our continuing long-range program.

  1. It is required that approval be granted for the conduct of the operation outlined in paragraph 2 above.

Initial

Oval Seal: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Received NOV 4 1963


EYES ONLY
SECRT

Declassified under the provisions
Of the JFK Assassinations Records
Collection Act of 1962 (PL1DQ4161(?)
By_____NARA, Date 9/22/90


[BK Notes: Thanks to Max Holland for calling attention to this document] 

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

JFK Assassination Goes to Court

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Monday, February 25, 2013

Morley v. CIA in Court


Jeff wrote on Facebook:
The hearing at the DC Court of Appeals went very well this morning. Judge Harry Edwards, a liberal, was clearly sympathetic to my case. Judge Stephen Williams, a conservative, was skeptical, though less vocally. Judge Brett Kavanagh, also conservative, didn't say much. I'll have a more detailed take on JFK Facts later today but for now I'm relieved its over. And I likes my chances!

Anonymous report from someone who was there:
     I attended oral argument this morning in the US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit on the Morley v. CIA case where the issue was whether the district judge abused his discretion in denying attorneys fees.  During the government's argument Judge Edwards gave a strong defense of FOIA researchers and awarding attorneys fees.  He said it is not for the government alone to determine whether a researcher should be interested in a topic or whether the topic is in the public interest.  He said the test under court precedent is a topic/subject test rather than a content of documents test.  It is irrelevant for the government to argue the documents released did not contain important information if the topic or subject was one of public interest- it is not possible for a researcher to know where the research will ultimately lead when beginning a project.  Judge Edwards stated the district judge did not following circuit precedent in the case by not following Davy.  Judges Kavanaugh and Williams remained silent and did not defend the government on this.  Judge Williams had some negative-sounding questions for Jim Lesar during plaintiff's argument.  J. Edwards was so strong on his points that it gave some hope he might carry the day with his colleagues, or if not it would be a split decision. 


Federal judges hear arguments about CIA JFK assassination records


A three-judge federal appellate court in Washington DC heard oral arguments Monday about the significance of certain CIA records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a rare event in the long-running controversy over the murder of the popular chief executive almost 50 years ago.

While JFK’s assassination in Dallas on November 22, 1963, has been the subject of six governmental investigations, and will be the focus of a dozen new books and at least three major motion movies in 2013, the federal courts have rarely sat in judgment on issues related to the crime. That changed Monday morning when the U.S. Court of Appeals heard two lawyers clash over the public benefits of JFK documents released as a result of Morley v. CIA, a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit that I filed in 2003.

The senior jurist on the panel, Judge Harry Edwards, challenged the government’s contention that the records are not related to JFK’s assassination, while Judge Stephen Williams expressed skepticism about my argument that the litigation has been beneficial because it made JFK records more readily available to the public.

At issue in the hearing was a narrow legal question: whether lower court Judge Richard Leon had abused his discretion in a Sept. 2012 ruling supporting the CIA’s refusal to pay my court costs incurred in the course of a decade of litigation. Under FOIA, successful plaintiffs are entitled to have the government pay their court costs. After a three-judge panel from the Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in my favor in December 2007, my attorney Jim Lesar requested the government pay his legal fees, now estimated to be $150,000.

But the broader issue of the significance of the released CIA documents took up much of the hour-long hearing in the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse, located a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol.

“The lower courts erred in three ways. The new documents contain new information. They contain important information, and that information is related to the JFK assassination,” said Lesar in his opening remarks, citing the agency’s 2008 disclosure that undercover CIA officer George Joannides had received a Career Intelligence Medal in 1981, three years after serving as the agency’s liaison to congressional JFK investigators. Lesar argued that Joannides was honored for his JFK-related duties

“Was the information weighty enough to rule in favor of [legal fees for] the plaintiff?” replied Assistant U.S. Attorney Benton Peterson on behalf of the CIA. “The answer is no.” Peterson argued that a civilian review panel, the Assassination Records Review Board, had seen the Joannides records in the 1990s and concluded they were not related to JFK’s assassination.
Judge Williams, a conservative appointed by President Ronald Reagan, opened the questioning by challenging Lesar’s contention that the lawsuit had benefited the public by bringing together all the Joannides records in one place. “Aren’t all these records now available at NARA [National Archives]?” he asked.

Lesar said the documents were not available online as the government contended and were not easily searchable. He added that the document disclosing Joannides’ Career Intelligence Medal was not available before the lawsuit.

“You’re pinning a lot on that one document, aren’t you?” asked Judge Brett Kavanagh, a conservative appointed by President George W. Bush.

“The lawsuit produced other important documents,” Lesar replied, such as a travel expense form showing Joannides’ duties included travel to New Orleans, where accused assassin Lee Oswald lived for much of 1963. Lesar also said that the lawsuit had forced the CIA to acknowledge that it retains 295 documents about Joannides’ career that have not been released in any form.

“That’s an important piece of information we did not have before,” he said.

The sharpest questioning came from Judge Edwards and was directed at Peterson’s argument that the litigation had produced no information of public benefit.

“The law of the circuit is that the test for public benefit is the topic and the purpose of the search, which is appropriate because we don’t have the expertise to assess the significance of the research,” said Edwards, a liberal appointed by President Jimmy Carter. “You’re talking a lot about what’s in the records but that’s not the test. The lower court applied the wrong test.”

“There wasn’t any information requested and received that was weighty enough to benefit the public,” Peterson replied.

“If you use the topic test,” Edwards said, referring to JFK’s assassination, “it is weighty. I think they [the plaintiffs] met their burden in topic and purpose.”

Edwards also questioned Peterson’s claim that the ARRB review of the records settled the question of their relevance.

“A smart researcher might come in and see some connections that the government doesn’t,” he said.

The issue will be decided by a vote of the three judges. A decision is expected in four to eight week.