Sunday, February 9, 2020

Ending the Great Debate


The Great JFK Assassination Debate isn’t over but can be. No I don’t mean the Single Bullet Theory, whether the Zapruder Film or the autopsy photos were altered, whether Prayer Man is Oswald or over whether you belive Judyth Vary Baker or not.

I mean we can end the great debate over whether the Warren Commission conclusions are correct, so we can once and for all, put to rest the debate over whether one man alone was responsible for the murder of the President. Part of the difficulty in resolving the outstanding issues related to the assassination is the idea that the crime is solved and one man alone – Lee Harvey Oswald, was responsible for the crime.

Determining the role of the accused assassin is essential before we can move on to figuring out what really happened at Dealey Plaza and determining exactly who killed the President, how they did it and why.
Before you can even begin to search for the true killers of the President, you have to deal with the official conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, and get past that by dispensing with Oswald.

It’s not a speed bump, it’s a brick wall you have to get around, over, under or bulldoze through, but to get further you need to dispose with Oswald, and that can be done.

As long as one reasonable person can contend that Oswald did the dirty deed all alone you can’t move on to resolve the other issues. And there is a way around that roadblock. If you can’t win it be analysis and debate, it can be eleminated by deciding it really doesn’t matter what the role of the accused assassin was – shooter or Patsy, because he was just a pawn in a much bigger game.

This can be done in a number of ways, including clearly demonstrating that Oswald was not in a position to be on the Sixth Floor at the time of the shooting, was not the sniper in the window, and was what he claimed to be – framed as the Patsy. “Don’t believe the so-called evidence,” he said, and we should take that advice.

It can also be done by recognizing that whatever you believe happened at Dealey Plaza, Oswald was a covert intelligence operative, utilized trained covert operational techniques and procedures, and fits the Covert Operative Personality profile (COP), so what occurred at Dealey Plaza was a covert intelligence operation and can only be resolved by a Counter-Intelligence Operation rather than a regular criminal investigation.

As Bill Simpich (See: State Secret) has observed, you begin to understand what happened at Dealey Plaza when you recognize it as an operation – a covert intelligence operation, and then everything begins to fall into place.

If the person you believe killed the President was Lee Harvey Oswald – the one born in New Orleans, served in the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) with David Ferrie, tested as a Passive-Aggressive personality in the MMPI, attended Arlington Heights High School in Fort Worth, enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps, was trained in radar and communications and the Russian language, served at Atsugi, Japan and San Diego, was given an early discharge, assigned to the USMC Reserves, made his way to Moscow via Helsinki, defected to the Soviet Union, worked in a radio factory in Minsk, married a Russian women, the niece of a Soviet military colonel, returned to the Texas where he associated with George deMohrenschildt, Col. Lawrence Orlov, George Bouhe, Jean deMenil and other anti-Communist White Russians, was introduced to Volkmar Schmidt at a special party set up for the Oswalds to meet the Paines, ordered a rifle and pistol through the mail using a P.O. box and alias, took a pot shot at General Walker, relocated back to his hometown of New Orleans in the summer of 1963 where he associated with Guy Banister, David Ferrie, Jack Martin and Clay Shaw, attempted to obtain a job and voter registration in Clinton, La., visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies in Mexico City attempting to get a visa to Cuba, returned to Texas where his wife Marina lived with Ruth Paine, who assisted him in obtaining a job a the Texas School Book Depository, from where he is accused of shooting and killing the President and wounding Governor Connally. That Lee Harvey Oswald?
If so then THAT Oswald fits the Covert Operational Personality (COP) profile – as every intelligence analyst in the world immediately recognized as the information about him became available.

Therefore, rather than a traditional criminal investigation, the assassination of the President requires a counter-intelligence investigation to determine exactly what occurred at Dealey Plaza that day.

The difference is a standard criminal investigation obtains evidence and witness testimony that can be introduced into a court of law, while a counter-intelligence operation utilizes every means at its disposal to obtain information on what occurred in order to determine the total truth.

And that is what we are trying to do.

If you can please support this work:

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

What if Oswald was knowingly the patsy? What if he knew that fake, easily discredited evidence was being created to frame him so that he would escape conviction? If his purpose to serve as a red herring, wouldn’t this give him confidence to withstand interrogation?